Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398655›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2021

How Resiliency and Hope Can Predict Stress of Covid-19 by Mediating Role of Spiritual Well-being Based on Machine Learning.

Roghieh Nooripour, Simin Hosseinian, Abir Jaafar Hussain, Mohsen Annabestani, Ameer Maadal, Laurel E Radwin, Peyman Hassani-Abharian, Nikzad Ghanbari Pirkashani, Abolghasem Khoshkonesh

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Religiousness in the first year of COVID-19: A systematic review of empirical research.Current research in ecological and social psychology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Roghieh NooripourDepartment of Counseling, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran. r.noori@alzahra.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5677-0894
Simin HosseinianDepartment of Counseling, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
Abir Jaafar HussainComputer Science Department, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L33AF, UK.
Mohsen AnnabestaniFaculty of Electrical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Azadi Ave, PO Box 11365-11155, Tehran, Iran.
Ameer MaadalDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Shahr-E Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Laurel E RadwinCenter for Health Care Organizational and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Peyman Hassani-AbharianInstitute for Cognitive Science Studies, Brain and Cognition Clinic, Tehran, Iran.
Nikzad Ghanbari PirkashaniClinical Psychology (Prevention and Treatment of Addiction, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University (SBU), Tehran, Iran.
Abolghasem KhoshkoneshDepartment of Counseling, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University (SBU), Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are playing a tremendous role in all aspects of human life and they have the remarkable potential to solve many problems that classic sciences are unable to solve appropriately. Neuroscience and especially psychiatry is one of the most important fields that can use the potential of AI and ML. This study aims to develop an ML-based model to detect the relationship between resiliency and hope with the stress of COVID-19 by mediating the role of spiritual well-being. An online survey is conducted to assess the psychological responses of Iranian people during the Covid-19 outbreak in the period between March 15 and May 20, 2020, in Iran. The Iranian public was encouraged to take part in an online survey promoted by Internet ads, e-mails, forums, social networks, and short message service (SMS) programs. As a whole, 755 people participated in this study. Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants, The Resilience Scale, The Adult Hope Scale, Paloutzian & Ellison's Spiritual Wellbeing Scale, and Stress of Covid-19 Scale were used to gather data. The findings showed that spiritual well-being itself cannot predict stress of Covid-19 alone, and in fact, someone who has high spiritual well-being does not necessarily have a small amount of stress, and this variable, along with hope and resiliency, can be a good predictor of stress. Our extensive research indicated that traditional analytical and statistical methods are unable to correctly predict related Covid-19 outbreak factors, especially stress when benchmarked with our proposed ML-based model which can accurately capture the nonlinear relationships between the collected data variables.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultArtificial IntelligenceHumansIranMachine LearningSARS-CoV-2Covid-19HopeMachine learningResiliencySpiritual well-beingStress

Identifiers

PMID33398655
PMCPMC7780917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.