Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398626›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2021

Review, Performance Comparison, and Validation of Models Predicting Type 2 Diabetes Remission After Bariatric Surgery in a Western European Population.

Philip Plaeke, Anthony Beunis, Martin Ruppert, Joris G De Man, Benedicte Y De Winter, Guy Hubens

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philip PlaekeLaboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics (LEMP), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. philip.plaeke@uantwerpen.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2794-3570
Anthony BeunisDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem (Antwerp), Belgium.
Martin RuppertDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem (Antwerp), Belgium.
Joris G De ManLaboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics (LEMP), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Benedicte Y De WinterLaboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics (LEMP), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Guy HubensDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem (Antwerp), Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe majority of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) achieve remission after bariatric surgery. Several models are available to preoperatively predict T2DM remission. This study compares the performance of these models in a Western population one year after surgery and explores their predictive value in comparison to a model specifically designed for our study population. MATERIALS AND

methodsPrediction models were retrieved using a literature search. Patients were retrospectively selected from a database of the Antwerp University Hospital. Performance of the models was assessed by determining the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the accuracy, and the goodness of fit, and by comparing them to a custom-made logistic model.

resultsThe probability of T2DM remission was calculated using 11 predictive scoring models and 8 regression models in a cohort of 250 patients. Complete T2DM remission occurred in 64.0% of patients. The IMS score (AUROC = 0.912; accuracy = 83.6%), DiaBetter score (0.907; 82.0%), and Ad-DiaRem score (0.903; 82.8%) best predicted T2DM remission and closely approached the performance of the custom-constructed model (0.917; 84.0%). The model by Ioffe et al. (0.630; 69.2%), Umemura et al. (0.692; 71.4%), and the ABCD score (0.757; 72.8%) were the least accurate.

conclusionMost T2DM remission models reliably predicted one-year T2DM remission, with limited inter-model differences. The accuracy of most models approached that of the custom-constructed model, indicating a high predictive capability and performance in our patient cohort. To date, most models are only validated to estimate T2DM remission one year after surgery and they do not predict long-term remission.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Obesity, MorbidHumansRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBariatric surgeryDiabetes remissionPredictive modelsType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.