Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398609›Full record

ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2021

COVID-19 treatment options: a difficult journey between failed attempts and experimental drugs.

Alessandra Bartoli, Filippo Gabrielli, Tatiana Alicandro, Fabio Nascimbeni, Pietro Andreone

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current Views About the Link between SARS-CoV-2 and the Liver: Friends or Foe?Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alessandra BartoliDivision of Internal Medicine and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. alessandra.bartoli25@yahoo.com.
Filippo GabrielliDivision of Internal Medicine and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Tatiana AlicandroDivision of Internal Medicine and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Fabio NascimbeniDivision of Internal Medicine and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Pietro AndreoneDivision of Internal Medicine and Metabolism, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its outbreak in China in December 2019 a novel Coronavirus, named SARS-CoV-2, has spread worldwide causing many cases of severe pneumonia, referred to as COVID-19 disease, leading the World Health Organization to declare a pandemic emergency in March 2020. Up to now, no specific therapy against COVID-19 disease exists. This paper aims to review COVID-19 treatment options currently under investigation. We divided the studied drugs into three categories (antiviral, immunomodulatory and other drugs). For each molecule, we discussed the putative mechanisms by which the drug may act against SARS-CoV-2 or may affect COVID-19 pathogenesis and the main clinical studies performed so far. The published clinical studies suffer from methodological limitations due to the emergency setting in which they have been conducted. Nevertheless, it seems that the timing of administration of the diverse categories of drugs is crucial in determining clinical efficacy. Antiviral drugs, in particular Remdesivir, should be administered soon after symptoms onset, in the viraemic phase of the disease; whereas, immunomodulatory agents, such as tocilizumab, anakinra and steroids, may have better results if administered in pneumonia/hyperinflammatory phases. Low-molecular-weight heparin may also have a role when facing COVID-19-related coagulopathy. Up to now, treatment choices have been inferred from the experience with other coronaviruses or viral infection outbreaks. Hopefully, in the near future, new treatment strategies will be available thanks to increased knowledge on SARS-CoV2 virus and COVID-19 pathogenesis. In the meanwhile, further well-designed clinical trials are urgently needed to establish a standard of care in COVID-19 disease.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19Drugs, InvestigationalHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansImmunologic FactorsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2SteroidsAntiviral AgentsDrugs, InvestigationalHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightImmunologic FactorsSteroidsAntiviral drugsLow-molecular-weight heparinRemdesivirSARS-CoV2TherapyTocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID33398609
PMCPMC7781413
OpenAlexW3118258583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.