Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398592›Full record

ArticleJA clinical reports2021

An optimal epidural catheter placement site for post-cesarean section analgesia with double-space technique combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: a retrospective study.

Yuya Murata, Kumiko Yamada, Yuto Hamaguchi, Soichiro Yamashita, Makoto Tanaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JA clinical reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The significance of different intervertebral spaces in combined spinal epidural anesthesia in cesarean section.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuya MurataDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1, Amakubo, Tuskuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan. murata-yu@umin.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7637-8278
Kumiko YamadaDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1, Amakubo, Tuskuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan.
Yuto HamaguchiDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1, Amakubo, Tuskuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan.
Soichiro YamashitaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institution of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.
Makoto TanakaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institution of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidural anesthesia affects lower extremities, which often prevents early mobilization postoperatively. The incidence of numbness and motor weakness in the lower extremities with respect to epidural catheter placement site in cesarean section (CS) is uncertain. We aimed to investigate the effect of catheter placement site on postoperative lower extremities numbness and motor weakness in patients who received combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for CS including analgesic effects and optimal epidural placement site in CS.

methodsWe retrospectively included 205 patients who underwent CS with CSEA at the University of Tsukuba Hospital between April 2018 and March 2020, and assessed numbness and motor weakness in the lower extremities. We also examined whether differences in the intervertebral space of epidural catheter placement and epidural effect on the lower extremities are related to analgesic effects. ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis.

resultsThe incidence of numbness and motor weakness were 67 (33%) and 28 (14%), respectively. All patients with motor weakness had numbness. A more caudal placement was associated with increased incidence of affected lower extremities. There was no significant difference in the analgesic effect depending on the catheter placement site. When the lower extremities were affected, the number of additional analgesics increased (p < 0.001). Patient-controlled epidural analgesia was used for fewer days in patients with motor weakness (p = 0.046).

conclusionIn CS, epidural catheter placement at T10-11 or T11-12 interspace is expected to reduce effect on the lower extremities and improve quality of postoperative analgesia.

Indexed as

Combined spinal–epidural anesthesiaMotor weaknessNumbnessObstetric anesthesiaPatient-controlled epidural analgesia

Identifiers

PMID33398592
PMCPMC7782655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.