Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398558›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Bile aspiration during EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy is associated with lower risk of postprocedural adverse events: a retrospective single-center study.

Hirotoshi Ishiwatari, Tatsunori Satoh, Junya Sato, Junichi Kaneko, Hiroyuki Matsubayashi, Yohei Yabuuchi, Yoshihiro Kishida, Masao Yoshida, Sayo Ito, Noboru Kawata and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary interventions.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hirotoshi IshiwatariDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan. ishihiro481019@gmail.com.
Tatsunori SatohDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan.
Junya SatoDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan.
Junichi KanekoDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hiroyuki MatsubayashiDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yohei YabuuchiDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yoshihiro KishidaDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan.
Masao YoshidaDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan.
Sayo ItoDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan.
Noboru KawataDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kenichiro ImaiDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kohei TakizawaDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kinichi HottaDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hiroyuki OnoDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan.
Shizuoka Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), reduction of pressure inside of the bile duct by bile aspiration is a well-known method to lower the rate of adverse events (AEs) including cholangitis. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) has been introduced as an alternative to ERCP. The use of self-expandable metallic stents is recommended in EUS-HGS to reduce bile leak; however, other methods to reduce the rate of AEs including bile leak, abdominal pain, fever, and sepsis, have not been elucidated yet. This study investigated whether bile aspiration during EUS-HGS decreased the rate of postprocedural AEs.

methodsConsecutive patients who underwent EUS-HGS between July 2016 and April 2020 were retrospectively evaluated in this study. EUS-HGS was performed at a tertiary cancer center. Patient characteristics, site of biliary obstruction, the quantity of bile aspirated during EUS-HGS, type of stent, whether or not antegrade stenting (AS) was performed, procedure time, and AEs were assessed based on a prospectively recorded institutional endoscopy database. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting postprocedural AEs.

resultsNinety-six patients were included in the study. EUS-guided HGS with and without AS was performed in 45 and 51 patients, respectively. Bile was aspirated in 71 patients (74%). The quantity of bile aspirated was 0-10 mL and > 10 mL in 40 and 56 patients, respectively. AEs including fever, abdominal pain, postprocedural cholangitis, sepsis, acute pancreatitis, and bleeding occurred in 45 patients (47%). The AE rates were 65% (26/40) and 34% (19/56), for 0-10 mL and > 10 mL bile, respectively (p = 0.004). Using multivariate analysis, the only independent factor affecting the occurrence of AEs was found to be an aspirated bile amount of 0-10 mL (odds ratio: 4.16; 95% CI 1.6-10.8).

conclusionsBile aspiration of more than 10 mL during EUS-HGS contributes to reducing the rate of postprocedural AEs.

Indexed as

CholestasisPancreatitisAcute DiseaseBileCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeDrainageEndosonographyHumansRetrospective StudiesStentsBile aspirationBile leakCholangitisEndoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainageSepsis

Identifiers

PMID33398558
OpenAlexW3118967554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.