Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398456›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2021

A comparison of femoral component rotation after total knee arthroplasty in Kanekasu radiographs, axial CT slices and 3D reconstructed images.

Emma L Robertson, Martin Hengherr, Felix Amsler, Michael T Hirschmann, Dominic T Mathis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emma L RobertsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Baselland (Bruderholz, Liestal, Laufen), 4101, Bruderholz, Switzerland.
Martin HengherrDepartment of Radiology, Kantonsspital Baselland (Bruderholz, Liestal, Laufen), 4101, Bruderholz, Switzerland.
Felix AmslerAmsler Consulting, 4059, Basel, Switzerland.
Michael T HirschmannDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Baselland (Bruderholz, Liestal, Laufen), 4101, Bruderholz, Switzerland.
Dominic T MathisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Baselland (Bruderholz, Liestal, Laufen), 4101, Bruderholz, Switzerland. dominic.mathis@unibas.ch.
University of Basel · CHKantonsspital Baselland Standort Bruderholz · CHMettler-Toledo (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the posterior condylar angle measured with Kanekasu radiograph and 2D-CT with the gold standard 3D-CT following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

methodsEighty-two knees with pain following TKA were included in this retrospective study. Two independent raters measured the anatomical and surgical posterior condylar angles twice on each Kanekasu radiograph and 2D-CT. These measurements were compared against the 3D-CT measurement. The intra- and interrater reliability of the Kanekasu radiograph and 2D-CT and the correlation with 3D-CT were calculated.

resultsThe intra- and interrater reliability for measurements of the anatomical posterior condyle angle for the Kanekasu radiograph and the 2D-CT were excellent for both raters (0.85-0.92). For the less experienced rater 1, the intrarater reliability was significantly better for 2D-CT than Kanekasu radiograph for measuring both the surgical (p < 0.01) and anatomical posterior condyle angles (p < 0.05). For the experienced rater 2, the intrarater reliability was significantly better for Kanekasu radiograph than 2D-CT for measurement of the surgical posterior condyle angle (p < 0.05). The correlation with 3D-CT is higher in 2D-CT than in Kanekasu radiograph (p < 0.01). While the Kanekasu radiograph predicts the 3D-CT angle with 65.9%, 2D-CT can measure the true angle with 82.9% certainty.

conclusionMeasurements using the anatomical transepicondylar axis are easier to replicate compared to the surgical transepicondylar axis. In comparison with the gold standard 3D-CT, 2D-CT showed a significantly higher correlation with 3D-CT than the Kanekasu measurements. If 3D-CT is available, it should be preferred over 2D-CT and Kanekasu view radiograph for femoral component rotation measurements.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeOsteoarthritis, KneeFemurHumansKnee JointReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesRotationTomography, X-Ray Computed2D computer tomographyKanekasuPredictionReliabilityRotational alignmentTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID33398456
PMCPMC8119264
OpenAlexW3118615841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.