Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398385›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2021

Optimization of training sets for genomic prediction of early-stage single crosses in maize.

Dnyaneshwar C Kadam, Oscar R Rodriguez, Aaron J Lorenz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Optimization of sparse phenotyping strategy in multi-environmental trials in maize.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Portability of genomic predictions trained on sparse factorial designs across two maize silage breeding cycles.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genomic prediction in hybrid breeding: I. Optimizing the training set design.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  11. A comparison of methods for training population optimization in genomic selection.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dnyaneshwar C KadamDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Oscar R RodriguezDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, 68583, USA.
Aaron J LorenzDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA. lore0149@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4361-1683
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture (US) 2012-67013-19460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageTraining population optimization algorithms are useful for efficiently training genomic prediction models for single-cross performance, especially if the population is extended beyond only realized crosses to all possible single crosses. Genomic prediction of single-cross performance could allow effective evaluation of all possible single crosses between all inbreds developed in a hybrid breeding program. The objectives of the present study were to investigate the effect of different levels of relatedness on genomic predictive ability of single crosses, evaluate the usefulness of deterministic formula to forecast prediction accuracy in advance, and determine the potential for TRS optimization based on prediction error variance (PEVmean) and coefficient of determination (CDmean) criteria. We used 481 single crosses made by crossing 89 random recombinant inbred lines (RILs) belonging to the Iowa stiff stalk synthetic group with 103 random RILs belonging to the non-stiff stalk synthetic heterotic group. As expected, predictive ability was enhanced by ensuring close relationships between TRSs and target sets, even when TRS sizes were smaller. We found that designing a TRS based on PEVmean or CDmean criteria is useful for increasing the efficiency of genomic prediction of maize single crosses. We went further and extended the sampling space from that of all observed single crosses to all possible single crosses, providing a much larger genetic space within which to design a training population. Using all possible single crosses increased the advantage of the PEVmean and CDmean methods based on expected prediction accuracy. This finding suggests that it may be worthwhile using an optimization algorithm to select a training population from all possible single crosses to maximize efficiency in training accurate models for hybrid genomic prediction.

Indexed as

Crosses, GeneticGenome, PlantGenomicsGenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticZea mays

Identifiers

PMID33398385
OpenAlexW3118332892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.