Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398323›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

Expansion and re-classification of the extracytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factor family.

Delia Casas-Pastor, Raphael R Müller, Sebastian Jaenicke, Karina Brinkrolf, Anke Becker, Mark J Buttner, Carol A Gross, Thorsten Mascher, Alexander Goesmann, Georg Fritz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transcriptional landscape of metal-resistantJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Expanding the genetic toolkit helps dissect a global stress response in the early-branching speciesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Delia Casas-PastorCenter for Synthetic Microbiology (SYNMIKRO), Philipps Universität Marburg, Germany.
Raphael R MüllerBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Giessen, Germany.
Sebastian JaenickeBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Giessen, Germany.
Karina BrinkrolfBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Giessen, Germany.
Anke BeckerCenter for Synthetic Microbiology (SYNMIKRO), Philipps Universität Marburg, Germany.
Mark J ButtnerDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
Carol A GrossDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; California Institute of Quantitative Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Thorsten MascherInstitute of Microbiology, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany.
Alexander GoesmannBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Giessen, Germany.
Georg FritzSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEJohn Innes Centre · GBQB3 · USTechnische Universität Dresden · DEThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004561/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N006852/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/00000015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracytoplasmic function σ factors (ECFs) represent one of the major bacterial signal transduction mechanisms in terms of abundance, diversity and importance, particularly in mediating stress responses. Here, we performed a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of this protein family by scrutinizing all proteins in the NCBI database. As a result, we identified an average of ∼10 ECFs per bacterial genome and 157 phylogenetic ECF groups that feature a conserved genetic neighborhood and a similar regulation mechanism. Our analysis expands previous classification efforts ∼50-fold, enriches many original ECF groups with previously unclassified proteins and identifies 22 entirely new ECF groups. The ECF groups are hierarchically related to each other and are further composed of subgroups with closely related sequences. This two-tiered classification allows for the accurate prediction of common promoter motifs and the inference of putative regulatory mechanisms across subgroups composing an ECF group. This comprehensive, high-resolution description of the phylogenetic distribution of the ECF family, together with the massive expansion of classified ECF sequences and an openly accessible data repository called 'ECF Hub' (https://www.computational.bio.uni-giessen.de/ecfhub), will serve as a powerful hypothesis-generator to guide future research in the field.

Indexed as

Multigene FamilyAmino Acid SequenceBacterial ProteinsConsensus SequenceDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesGene Expression Regulation, BacterialPhylogenySequence AlignmentSigma FactorSignal TransductionSubstrate SpecificityTerminology as TopicBacterial ProteinsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesSigma Factor

Identifiers

PMID33398323
PMCPMC7826278
OpenAlexW3120594158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.