Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398194›Full record

ReviewNature metabolism2021

Metabolites and the tumour microenvironment: from cellular mechanisms to systemic metabolism.

Ilaria Elia, Marcia C Haigis

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature metabolism, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 388 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
388citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
37.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

388 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 602 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Lactate, Carbohydrate Restriction, and Cancer Metabolism.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

328 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ilaria EliaDepartment of Cell Biology, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0922-9429
Marcia C HaigisDepartment of Cell Biology, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Marcia_Haigis@hms.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2530-2681
Harvard University · US

Funding

Molecular mechanisms of Nutrient sensing in cancerR01CA213062 · NCI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HAIGIS, MARCIA · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA213062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic transformation is a hallmark of cancer and a critical target for cancer therapy. Cancer metabolism and behaviour are regulated by cell-intrinsic factors as well as metabolite availability in the tumour microenvironment (TME). This metabolic niche within the TME is shaped by four tiers of regulation: (1) intrinsic tumour cell metabolism, (2) interactions between cancer cells and non-cancerous cells, (3) tumour location and heterogeneity and (4) whole-body metabolic homeostasis. Here, we define these modes of metabolic regulation and review how distinct cell types contribute to the metabolite composition of the TME. Finally, we connect these insights to understand how each of these tiers offers unique therapeutic potential to modulate the metabolic profile and function of all cells inhabiting the TME.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasmsTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID33398194
PMCPMC8097259
OpenAlexW3118685952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.