Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398143›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2021

Gendered movement ecology and landscape use in Hadza hunter-gatherers.

Brian M Wood, Jacob A Harris, David A Raichlen, Herman Pontzer, Katherine Sayre, Amelia Sancilio, Colette Berbesque, Alyssa N Crittenden, Audax Mabulla, Richard McElreath and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Heel-strike mechanics reveal evolutionary trade-offs in hominin bipedalism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Beyond the here and now: hunter-gatherer socio-spatial complexity and the evolution of language.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Lifestyle and patterns of physical activity in Hadza foragers.American journal of biological anthropology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Brian M WoodDepartment of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. brianwood@anthro.ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8187-9429
Jacob A HarrisInstitute of Human Origins, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5398-7871
David A RaichlenHuman and Evolutionary Biology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Herman PontzerDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2397-6543
Katherine SayreHuman and Evolutionary Biology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2554-4058
Amelia SancilioThe Center for Health and The Social Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Colette BerbesqueDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, UK.
Alyssa N CrittendenDepartment of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9196-737X
Audax MabullaDepartment of Archaeology and Heritage, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Richard McElreathDepartment of Human Behavior, Ecology and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0387-5377
Elizabeth CashdanDepartment of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7300-1539
James Holland JonesDepartment of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1680-6757

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
SPECIALIZED TRAINING PROGRAM IN THE DEMOGRAPHY &ECON.T32AG000243 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DAVID O MELTZER · 1994 to 2026
$8.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how gendered economic roles structure space use is critical to evolutionary models of foraging behaviour, social organization and cognition. Here, we examine hunter-gatherer spatial behaviour on a very large scale, using GPS devices worn by Hadza foragers to record 2,078 person-days of movement. Theory in movement ecology suggests that the density and mobility of targeted foods should predict spatial behaviour and that strong gender differences should arise in a hunter-gatherer context. As predicted, we find that men walked further per day, explored more land, followed more sinuous paths and were more likely to be alone. These data are consistent with the ecology of male- and female-targeted foods and suggest that male landscape use is more navigationally challenging in this hunter-gatherer context. Comparisons of Hadza space use with space use data available for non-human primates suggest that the sexual division of labour likely co-evolved with increased sex differences in spatial behaviour and landscape use.

Indexed as

Cultural CharacteristicsGender RoleMotor ActivityPopulation DensityPopulation DynamicsAfrica, EasternAnimalsAnthropology, PhysicalBiological EvolutionGender IdentityPopulation Growth

Identifiers

PMID33398143
PMCPMC8060163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.