Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398112›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2021

The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on fermented foods.

Maria L Marco, Mary Ellen Sanders, Michael Gänzle, Marie Claire Arrieta, Paul D Cotter, Luc De Vuyst, Colin Hill, Wilhelm Holzapfel, Sarah Lebeer, Dan Merenstein and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 341 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
341citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
81.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

341 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 744 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

281 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.

Maria L MarcoDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Mary Ellen SandersInternational Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics, Centennial, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6321-3423
Michael GänzleUniversity of Alberta, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0972-928X
Marie Claire ArrietaDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, International Microbiome Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Paul D CotterTeagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5465-9068
Luc De VuystResearch Group of Industrial Microbiology and Food Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences and Bioengineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Colin HillAPC Microbiome Ireland and School of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8527-1445
Wilhelm HolzapfelAdvanced Green Energy and Environment Institute, Handong Global University, Pohang, Gyeongbuk, South Korea.
Sarah LebeerDepartment of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Dan MerensteinDepartment of Family Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Gregor ReidLawson Health Research Institute, and Departments of Microbiology & Immunology and Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9658-5696
Benjamin E WolfeDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Robert HutkinsDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA. hutkins@unl.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1206-5947
Georgetown University · USHandong Global University · KRTeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IETufts University · USUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USVrije Universiteit Brussel · BEWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An expert panel was convened in September 2019 by The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) to develop a definition for fermented foods and to describe their role in the human diet. Although these foods have been consumed for thousands of years, they are receiving increased attention among biologists, nutritionists, technologists, clinicians and consumers. Despite this interest, inconsistencies related to the use of the term 'fermented' led the panel to define fermented foods and beverages as "foods made through desired microbial growth and enzymatic conversions of food components". This definition, encompassing the many varieties of fermented foods, is intended to clarify what is (and is not) a fermented food. The distinction between fermented foods and probiotics is further clarified. The panel also addressed the current state of knowledge on the safety, risks and health benefits, including an assessment of the nutritional attributes and a mechanistic rationale for how fermented foods could improve gastrointestinal and general health. The latest advancements in our understanding of the microbial ecology and systems biology of these foods were discussed. Finally, the panel reviewed how fermented foods are regulated and discussed efforts to include them as a separate category in national dietary guidelines.

Indexed as

Fermented FoodsNutrition PolicyPrebioticsProbioticsConsensusHumansPrebiotics

Identifiers

PMID33398112
PMCPMC7925329
OpenAlexW3119286420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.