Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33398008›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2021

Potential of ultra-high-resolution photon-counting CT of bone metastases: initial experiences in breast cancer patients.

E Wehrse, S Sawall, L Klein, P Glemser, S Delorme, H-P Schlemmer, M Kachelrieß, M Uhrig, C H Ziener, L T Rotkopf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Effects of non-stationary blur on texture biomarkers of bone using Ultra-High Resolution CT.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023
    Article
  16. Imaging in translational cancer research.Cancer biology & medicine · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E WehrseDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany. e.wehrse@dkfz-heidelberg.de.
S SawallMedical Faculty, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
L KleinDivision of X-Ray Imaging and Computed Tomography, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
P GlemserDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
S DelormeDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-2582
H-P SchlemmerDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
M KachelrießMedical Faculty, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
M UhrigDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
C H ZienerDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8854-7358
L T RotkopfDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9862-218X
German Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional CT scanners use energy-integrating detectors (EIDs). Photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) utilizes a CT detector technology based on smaller detector pixels capable of counting single photons and in addition discriminating their energy. Goal of this study was to explore the potential of higher spatial resolution for imaging of bone metastases. Four female patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer and bone metastases were included between July and October 2019. All patients underwent conventional EID CT scans followed by a high resolution non-contrast experimental PCD CT scan. Ultra-high resolution (UHR) reconstruction kernels were used to reconstruct axial slices with voxel sizes of 0.3 mm × 0.3 mm (inplane) × 1 mm (z-direction). Four radiologists blinded for patient identity assessed the images and compared the quality to conventional CT using a qualitative Likert scale. In this case series, we present images of bone metastases in breast cancer patients using an experimental PCD CT scanner and ultra-high-resolution kernels. A tendency to both a smaller inter-reader variability in the structural assessment of lesion sizes and in the readers' opinion to an improved visualization of lesion margins and content was observed. In conclusion, while further studies are warranted, PCD CT has a high potential for therapy monitoring in breast cancer.

Identifiers

PMID33398008
PMCPMC7782694
OpenAlexW3119018598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.