ArticleNature communications2021
Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in COVID-19 convalescent blood using a coronavirus antigen microarray.
Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
111 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 195 citations in OpenAlex.
- Convalescent plasma for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Convalescent plasma for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Precision transfusion medicine in the omics era.Blood · 2026Review
- Comprehensive profiling of humoral immune responses to pan-respiratory pathogens: Insights from diverse cohorts.iScience · 2026Article
- Article
- MVA-based vaccine candidates encoding the native or prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike reveal differential immunogenicity in humans.NPJ vaccines · 2024Article
- The immunobiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccine responses: potential influences of cross-reactive memory responses and aging on efficacy and off-target effects.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Clade 2.3.4.4 H5 chimeric cold-adapted attenuated influenza vaccines induced cross-reactive protection in mice and ferrets.Journal of virology · 2023Article
- Comparative Longitudinal Serological Study of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Profiles in People with COVID-19.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Serodominant SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Peptides Map to Unstructured Protein Regions.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Machine Learning Classification of Time since BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccination Based on Array-Measured Antibody Activity.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in a health care worker population during the early pandemic.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Potential treatments of COVID-19: Drug repurposing and therapeutic interventions.Journal of pharmacological sciences · 2023Review
- Fluorophore-encapsulated nanobeads for on-site, rapid, and sensitive lateral flow assay.Sensors and actuators. B, Chemical · 2023Article
- Coronavirus: a comparative analysis of detection technologies in the wake of emerging variants.Infection · 2023Review
- Peptide Microarrays for Flavivirus Diagnosis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Aptamer-Based Strategies to Address Challenges in COVID-19 Diagnosis and Treatments.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2023Review
- Analysis and comparison of SARS-CoV-2 variant antibodies and neutralizing activity for 6 months after a booster mRNA vaccine in a healthcare worker population.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
27 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The current practice for diagnosis of COVID-19, based on SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing of pharyngeal or respiratory specimens in a symptomatic patient at high epidemiologic risk, likely underestimates the true prevalence of infection. Serologic methods can more accurately estimate the disease burden by detecting infections missed by the limited testing performed to date. Here, we describe the validation of a coronavirus antigen microarray containing immunologically significant antigens from SARS-CoV-2, in addition to SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, common human coronavirus strains, and other common respiratory viruses. A comparison of antibody profiles detected on the array from control sera collected prior to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic versus convalescent blood specimens from virologically confirmed COVID-19 cases demonstrates near complete discrimination of these two groups, with improved performance from use of antigen combinations that include both spike protein and nucleoprotein. This array can be used as a diagnostic tool, as an epidemiologic tool to more accurately estimate the disease burden of COVID-19, and as a research tool to correlate antibody responses with clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.