Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33397518›Full record

ReviewLaboratory animal research2021

Nonhuman primate model in mammary gland biology and neoplasia research.

Fitriya N Dewi, J Mark Cline

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laboratory animal research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Harmonized nonhuman cancer database.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Exploring the One Health Paradigm in Male Breast Cancer.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Novel Mouse Models for Cancer Immunology.Annual review of cancer biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fitriya N DewiPrimate Research Center at IPB University, Jl. Lodaya II No.5, Bogor, West Java, 16151, Indonesia. fitriya.dewi@cbn.net.id.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7908-7879
J Mark ClineDepartment of Pathology, Section on Comparative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
IPB University · IDWake Forest University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on breast cancer pathogenesis, prevention and drug development remains an important field as this disease is still one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Nonhuman primates, particularly macaque species, may serve as a highly translational animal model in breast cancer studies due to their similarity with humans in genetics, anatomy, reproductive and endocrine physiology including mammary gland development profile. The use of nonhuman primates in biomedical research, however, requires high ethical standards and an increasing expectation to improve strategies to replace, reduce and refine their use. Here, we discuss some key features of nonhuman primate mammary gland biology relevant to their strengths and limitations as models in studies of breast development and cancer risk.

Indexed as

Animal modelBreast cancerBreast differentiationMacaquesMonkey

Identifiers

PMID33397518
PMCPMC7784333
OpenAlexW3120681370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.