Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33397509›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2021

General practitioner practice-based pharmacist input to medicines optimisation in the UK: pragmatic, multicenter, randomised, controlled trial.

Nadia Farhanah Syafhan, Sayer Al Azzam, Steven D Williams, Wendy Wilson, Jayne Brady, Peter Lawrence, Mark McCrudden, Mustafa Ahmed, Michael G Scott, Glenda Fleming and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03241498 (GP Practice Based Pharmacist Input to Medicines Optimisation), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03241498 nacompletednot on this map

GP Practice Based Pharmacist Input to Medicines Optimisation

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen's University, BelfastRan2016 to 2019Enrolled356ConditionsMedication AdherenceArmsMedicines optimisation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient and family engagement interventions in primary care patient safety: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Commentary: how person-centred is pharmaceutical care?International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Nadia Farhanah SyafhanClinical and Practice Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3535-0209
Sayer Al AzzamClinical and Practice Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK.
Steven D WilliamsWestbourne Medical Centre, Dorset, UK.
Wendy WilsonWingate Medical Centre, Liverpool, UK.
Jayne BradyWingate Medical Centre, Liverpool, UK.
Peter LawrencePendle View Medical Centre, Nelson, UK.
Mark McCruddenAntrim Area Hospital, Antrim, UK.
Mustafa AhmedFern House Surgery, Essex, UK.
Michael G ScottMedicines Optimisation Innovation Centre (MOIC), Antrim, UK.
Glenda FlemingMedicines Optimisation Innovation Centre (MOIC), Antrim, UK.
Anita HoggMedicines Optimisation Innovation Centre (MOIC), Antrim, UK.
Claire ScullinMedicines Optimisation Innovation Centre (MOIC), Antrim, UK.
Robert HorneSchool of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.
Harblas AhirMerck Sharp & Dohme Limited, Hoddesdon, UK.
James C McElnayClinical and Practice Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK. j.mcelnay@qub.ac.uk.
Queen's University Belfast · GBAdvanced Defence Materials (United Kingdom) · GBAntrim Area Hospital · GBMSD (UK) Limited (United Kingdom) · GBPendle Community Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry MOIC001Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education 20160422046233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChanging demographics across the UK has led to general practitioners (GPs) managing increasing numbers of older patients with multi-morbidity and resultant polypharmacy. Through government led initiatives within the National Health Service, an increasing number of GP practices employ pharmacist support. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a medicines optimisation intervention, delivered by GP practice-based pharmacists, to patients at risk of medication-related problems (MRPs), on patient outcomes and healthcare costs.

methodsA multi-centre, randomised (normal care or pharmacist supplemented care) study in four regions of the UK, involving patients (n = 356) from eight GP practices, with a 6-month follow-up period. Participants were adult patients who were at risk of MRPs.

resultsMedian number of MRPs per intervention patient were reduced at the third assessment, i.e. 3 to 0.5 (p < 0.001) in patients who received the full intervention schedule. Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) scores were reduced (medications more appropriate) for the intervention group, but not for control group patients (8 [4-13] to 5 [0-11] vs 8 [3-13] to 7 [3-12], respectively; p = 0.001). Using the intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, the number of telephone consultations in intervention group patients was reduced and different from the control group (1 [0-3] to 1 [0-2] vs 1 [0-2] to 1 [0-3], p = 0.020). No significant differences between groups were, however, found in unplanned hospital admissions, length of hospital stay, number of A&E attendances or outpatient visits. The mean overall healthcare cost per intervention patient fell from £1041.7 ± 1446.7 to £859.1 ± 1235.2 (p = 0.032). Cost utility analysis showed an incremental cost per patient of - £229.0 (95% CI - 594.6, 128.2) and a mean QALY gained of 0.024 (95% CI - 0.021 to 0.065), i.e. indicative of a health status gain at a reduced cost (2016/2017).

conclusionThe pharmacist service was effective in reducing MRPs, inappropriateness of medications and telephone consultations in general practice in a cost-effective manner.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT03241498. Registered 7 August 2017-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03241498.

Indexed as

Clinical pharmacistGeneral practiceHealthcare resource utilisationMedicines optimisationPractice-based pharmacist

Identifiers

PMID33397509
PMCPMC7784025
OpenAlexW3118816280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.