Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33397501›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2021

What factors are most important for the development of the maternal-fetal relationship? A prospective study among pregnant women in Danish general practice.

Ruth K Ertmann, Christine W Bang, Margit Kriegbaum, Mette S Væver, Jakob Kragstrup, Volkert Siersma, Philip Wilson, Melissa C Lutterodt, Johanne Smith-Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Maternal-fetal bonding during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ruth K ErtmannThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. ruth@sund.ku.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4629-3518
Christine W BangThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Margit KriegbaumThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette S VæverDepartmant of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jakob KragstrupThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Volkert SiersmaThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Philip WilsonThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Melissa C LutterodtThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Johanne Smith-NielsenDepartmant of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Danish General Practice Fund EMN-2017-00265Fonden til Lægevidenskabens Fremme 21. december 2016-16-87FP7 Regions of Sealand 412030Lilly and Herbert Hansens Fond (DK) Agger 7. november 2016Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF 130C0002689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDevelopment of the maternal antenatal attachment (MAA) constitutes an important aspect of the transition into motherhood. Early identification of women at risk of developing a poor MAA provides possibilities for preventive interventions targeting maternal mental health and the emerging mother-infant relationship. In this study, we investigate the relative importance of an extensive set of psychosocial, pregnancy-related, and physiological factors measured in the first trimester of pregnancy for MAA measured in third trimester.

methodsA prospective study was conducted among pregnant women in Danish general practice (GP). Data were obtained in the first and the third trimester from pregnancy health records and electronic questionnaires associated with routine GP antenatal care visits. The Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS) was used to assess maternal antenatal attachment. The relative importance of potential determinants of maternal antenatal attachment was assessed by the relative contribution of each factor to the fit (R

resultsThe sample consisted of 1328 women. Low antenatal attachment (Total MAAS ≤ 75) was observed for 513 (38.6%) women. Perceived social support (having someone to talk to and having access to practical help when needed) emerged as the most important determinant. Furthermore, scores on the MAAS decreased with worse self-rated health, poor physical fitness, depression, increasing age, having given birth previously, and higher education.

conclusionPregnant women reporting lack of social support and general low physical and mental well-being early in pregnancy may be at risk for developing a poor MAA. An approach targeting both psychosocial and physiological well-being may positively influence expectant mothers' successful adaptation to motherhood.

Indexed as

Health StatusMental HealthAdultDenmarkFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMaternal-Fetal RelationsMother-Child RelationsObject AttachmentPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSocial SupportCohortGeneral practiceMaternal antenatal attachmentPregnancy-related symptomsPregnantRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID33397501
PMCPMC7784374
OpenAlexW3119010447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.