Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33397471›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2021

Repurposing existing drugs for new uses: a cohort study of the frequency of FDA-granted new indication exclusivities since 1997.

Babak Sahragardjoonegani, Reed F Beall, Aaron S Kesselheim, Aidan Hollis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Rare Disease Drug Repurposing.JAMA network open · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A Regulatory Roadmap for Repurposing: Comparing Pathways for Making Repurposed Drugs Available In The EU, UK, And US.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Repurposing of the Drug Tezosentan for Cancer Therapy.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Recycled Translation: Repurposing Drugs for Stroke.Translational stroke research · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Babak SahragardjooneganiDepartment of Economics, University of Calgary, 527 Campus Place N.W., Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Reed F BeallDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine and O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Aaron S KesselheimProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital / Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont St., Suite 3030, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
Aidan HollisDepartment of Economics, University of Calgary, 527 Campus Place N.W., Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada. ahollis@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5125-2193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug repurposing (i.e., finding novel uses for existing drugs) is essential for maximizing medicines' therapeutic utility, but obtaining regulatory approval for new indications is costly. Policymakers have therefore created temporary indication-specific market exclusivities to incentivize drug innovators to run new clinical investigations. The effectiveness of these exclusivities is poorly understood.

objectiveTo determine whether generic entry impacts the probability of new indication additions.

methodsFor a cohort of all new small-molecule drugs approved by the FDA between July 1997 and May 2020, we tracked new indications added for the subset of drugs that experienced generic entry during the observation period and then analyzed how the probability of a new indication changed with the number of years since/to generic entry.

resultsOf the 197 new drugs that subsequently experienced generic entry, only 64 (32%) had at least one new indication added. The probability of a new indication addition peaked above 4% between 7 and 8 years prior to generic entry and then to dropped to near zero 15 years after FDA approval. We show that the limited duration of exclusivity reduces the number of secondary indications significantly.

conclusionStatus quo for most drug innovators is creating novel one-indication products. Despite indication-specific exclusivities, the imminence of generic entry still has a detectable impact on reducing the chances of new indication additions. There is much room for improvement when it comes to incentivizing clinical investigations for new uses and unlocking existing medicines' full therapeutic potential.

Identifiers

PMID33397471
PMCPMC7780607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.