Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33397434›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2021

How the pan-genome is changing crop genomics and improvement.

Rafael Della Coletta, Yinjie Qiu, Shujun Ou, Matthew B Hufford, Candice N Hirsch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Multi-variant GWAS and genomic prediction dissect the genetic architecture underlying tomato fruit weight.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Structural Variation and Its Roles in Plant Genomes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A sorghum-anchored pan-grass syntenic gene set in grasses.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rafael Della ColettaDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Yinjie QiuDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Shujun OuDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Matthew B HuffordDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA. mhufford@iastate.edu.
Candice N HirschDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA. cnhirsch@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8833-3023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop genomics has seen dramatic advances in recent years due to improvements in sequencing technology, assembly methods, and computational resources. These advances have led to the development of new tools to facilitate crop improvement. The study of structural variation within species and the characterization of the pan-genome has revealed extensive genome content variation among individuals within a species that is paradigm shifting to crop genomics and improvement. Here, we review advances in crop genomics and how utilization of these tools is shifting in light of pan-genomes that are becoming available for many crop species.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantComputational BiologyCrops, AgriculturalDNA Transposable ElementsGenetic VariationGenomicsDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID33397434
PMCPMC7780660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.