Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33397396›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Systematic scoping review of factors and measures of rurality: toward the development of a rurality index for health care research in Japan.

Makoto Kaneko, Ryuichi Ohta, Evelyn Vingilis, Maria Mathews, Thomas Robert Freeman

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Makoto KanekoPrimary Care Research Unit, Graduate School of Health Data Science, Yokohama City University, 22-2, Seto, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0027, Japan. kanekom@yokohama-cu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4581-8274
Ryuichi OhtaDepartment of Community Care, Unnan City Hospital, 699-1221 96-1 Iida, Daito-Cho, Unnan City, Shimane, Japan.
Evelyn VingilisDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine, London, Ontario, Canada.
Maria MathewsDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine, London, Ontario, Canada.
Thomas Robert FreemanDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

the Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists 20K18847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRural-urban health care disparities are an important topic in health services research. Hence, developing valid and reliable tools to measure rurality is needed to support high quality research. However, Japan, has no index to measure rurality for health care research. In this study, we conducted a systematic scoping review to identify the important factors and methodological approaches to consider in a rurality index to inform the development of a rurality index for Japan.

methodsFor our review, we searched six bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHIL, ERIC, Web of Science and the Grey Literature Report) and official websites of national governments such as Government and Legislative Libraries Online Publications Portal (GALLOP), from 1 January 1989 to 31 December 2018. We extracted relevant variables used in the development of rurality indices, the formulas used to calculate indices, and any measures for reliability and validity of these indices.

resultsWe identified 17 rurality indices from 7 countries. These indices were primarily developed to assess access to health care or to determine eligibility for incentives for health care providers. Frequently used factors in these indices included population size/density and travel distance/time to emergency care or referral centre. Many indices did not report reliability or validity measures.

conclusionsWhile the concept of rurality and concerns about barriers to access to care for rural residents is shared by many countries, the operationalization of rurality is highly context-specific, with few universal measures or approaches to constructing a rurality index. The results will be helpful in the development of a rurality index in Japan and in other countries.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchRural PopulationHealthcare DisparitiesHumansJapanReproducibility of ResultsGeographyHealth services researchJapanRurality indexScoping review

Identifiers

PMID33397396
PMCPMC7780409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.