Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33397360›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

Research training program in a Turkish medical school: challenges, barriers and opportunities from the perspectives of the students and faculty members.

Zeliha Öcek, Hilal Batı, Ebru Demirel Sezer, Özge Altun Köroğlu, Özlem Yılmaz, Nilüfer Demiral Yılmaz, Aliye Mandıracıoğlu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zeliha ÖcekDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Hilal BatıDepartment of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Ebru Demirel SezerDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, 35100, Izmir, Turkey. ebru.sezer@ege.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6900-3539
Özge Altun KöroğluDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Özlem YılmazDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Nilüfer Demiral YılmazDepartment of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Aliye MandıracıoğluDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Ege University · TR

Funding

Ege University Scientific Research Projects Commission 18-TIP-018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding medical students with opportunities for research experience is challenging for medical schools in developing countries. The Research Training Program (RTP), which is carried out in Ege University Faculty of Medicine (EUFM) parallel to the core curriculum, aims to improve the scientific competencies of the highly motivated students and to provide them with the opportunity to conduct a research. The purpose of this project is to evaluate RTP through the perspectives of students and faculty members.

methodsThis phenomenological study included two groups; students of RTP and faculty members who contributed to the program. Interviews were conducted with the research group whose selection was determined by maximum variation technique. Interviews with new individuals continued until data saturation was reached. Interpretative data analysis started with close reading of the transcripts and generating a list of codes. Coding by two independently, developing categories and themes were the following steps.

resultsTwenty-one RTP students and 14 faculty members were interviewed. The main motivation for students to participate was the desire to learn how to do research. The introduction course providing the students with the basic competencies needs to be improved in terms of practical activities. It was reported that during the project process students needed intensive guidance especially in finding a research topic and a mentor. The students' lack of time, deficit of enough mentoring and the fact that conducting a research does not provide a competitive advantage for residency are important obstacles to the completion of the program. The most frequently mentioned achievement of the students is to learn all the stages of the research as well as getting acquainted with critical thinking.

conclusionsThis research showed that it was realistic to implement research programs for highly motivated students in medical schools with conditions like those in EUFM. The solution of mentor shortage emerged in this study is dependent on the adoption of student research as a national policy. Getting acquainted with the interrogative thinking style, conducting research, and making lifelong learning a core value are more important outcomes of research programs than the number of completed projects.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalCurriculumFacultyHumansMentorsSchools, MedicalMedical studentResearchScience education, undergraduate researchScientific competencies

Identifiers

PMID33397360
PMCPMC7780673
OpenAlexW3112536228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.