Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33397342›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

In vitro elution characteristics of gentamicin-impregnated Polymethylmethacrylate: premixed with a second powder vs. liquid Lyophilization.

Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Suwipa Ungphaiboon, Arnurai Jitsurong, Natnicha Ingviya, Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich, Varah Yuenyongviwat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wongthawat LiawrungrueangDepartment of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Suwipa UngphaiboonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand.
Arnurai JitsurongForensic Medicine and Toxicology Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand.
Natnicha IngviyaMicrobiology Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand.
Boonsin TangtrakulwanichDepartment of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Varah YuenyongviwatDepartment of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand. varahortho@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0338-7733

Funding

Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University 59-332-11-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic-loaded bone cement, or antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), were developed to prevent and treat bone and joint infections. Gentamicin is an antibiotic that is commonly used in combination with PMMA; however, gentamicin powder is hard to obtain in many countries. This study aimed to evaluate the elution characteristics of gentamicin-impregnated PMMA made with lyophilized liquid gentamicin, compared with PMMA; which is made from commercial gentamicin powder.

methodsThe experimental sample was divided into 2 groups: the gentamicin power group (PG-PMMA) and the lyophilized liquid gentamicin group (LG-PMMA). Ten cement spacers were prepared in each group. These were produced by mixing gentamicin powder, or lyophilized liquid gentamicin, with a powder polymer before adding the liquid monomer (2 g of gentamicin and 40 g of PMMA). The volume and surface area of the antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers were 50 cm

resultsThe collections from both groups had high concentrations of gentamicin on day 1 (113.63 ± 23.42 mg/dL in LG-PMMA and 61.7 ±8.37 mg/dL in PG-PMMA), but experienced a continuous decrease over time. The PMMA spacers from both groups could release gentamicin for up to 6 weeks (3.28 ± 1.17 mg/dL in LG-PMMA and 1.21 ± 0.28 mg/dL in PG-PMMA). However, there were significantly higher levels of gentamicin concentrations in the LG-PMMA group compared to the PG-PMMA group at all time points (P< 0.05).

conclusionGentamicin-impregnated PMMA made with lyophilized liquid gentamicin had approximately a two times higher rate of antibiotic elution in preliminary in vitro studies, as compared with PMMA made with premixed gentamicin powder.

Indexed as

GentamicinsPolymethyl MethacrylateAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone CementsFreeze DryingHumansPowdersVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone CementsGentamicinsPolymethyl MethacrylatePowdersVancomycinAntibiotic spacerElution characteristicsLiquid gentamicinLyophilization

Identifiers

PMID33397342
PMCPMC7784340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.