Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33397297›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2021

Motor-enriched learning for improving pre-reading and word recognition skills in preschool children aged 5-6 years - study protocol for the PLAYMORE randomized controlled trial.

Anne Kær Gejl, Anne Sofie Bøgh Malling, Linn Damsgaard, Anne-Mette Veber-Nielsen, Jacob Wienecke

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04618822 (Motor-enriched Learning for Improving Pre-reading and Word Recognition Skills in Preschool Children Aged 5-6 Years), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04618822 nacompletednot on this map

Motor-enriched Learning for Improving Pre-reading and Word Recognition Skills in Preschool Children Aged 5-6 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CopenhagenRan2020 to 2021Enrolled149ConditionsReadingArmsTeaching involving whole-body movements, Teaching involving hand movements, Teaching involving minimal motor movements (control)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne Kær GejlIntegrative Physiology, Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Nørre allé 51, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark. annekaerg@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6781-2263
Anne Sofie Bøgh MallingIntegrative Physiology, Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Nørre allé 51, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Linn DamsgaardIntegrative Physiology, Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Nørre allé 51, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne-Mette Veber-NielsenNational Centre for Reading, University College Copenhagen, Humletorvet 3, 1799 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacob WieneckeIntegrative Physiology, Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Nørre allé 51, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond 8018-00132B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResults from previous studies suggest that bodily movements, spanning from gestures to whole-body movements, integrated into academic lessons may benefit academic learning. However, only few studies have investigated the effects of movement integrated into reading practice. The PLAYMORE study aims to investigate the effects of two interventions focusing on a close and meaningful coupling between bodily movement and academic content on early pre-reading and word recognition skills in children. Further, the study aims to compare two interventions involving either hand movements (i.e. using arms and hands) or whole-body movements (i.e. using the whole body). Potential mediating factors underlying the link between bodily movement on early pre-reading and word recognition skills will be explored. METHODS/

designThe PLAYMORE study will be conducted as a three-armed randomized controlled trial including children aged five to six years recruited from four schools in the Copenhagen area, Denmark. Stratified by class, children will be randomly allocated to one of three 8-week intervention/control periods: 1) teaching involving whole-body movements, 2) teaching involving hand movements (i.e. arms and hands) or 3) teaching involving minimal motor movements (i.e. seated on a chair using paper and pencil). Outcome measurements, including pre-reading and word recognition skills, will be collected before and after the intervention period to assess the intervention effects. This study protocol follows the SPIRIT guidelines. DISCUSSION: The PLAYMORE study will add to the current knowledge concerning the link between bodily movement and academic performance with important details about pre-reading and word recognition skills in preschool children. If effective, evaluation of the implementation of the PLAYMORE program should be conducted in order to investigate whether the effects can be transferred into standard school settings. The PLAYMORE study will lay the foundation for future research that have the potential to inform the political and scientific debate and importantly, to provide teachers with detailed information of how to implement movements effectively during teaching in order to support and motivate children in the process of learning to read.

trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04618822 ) the 5th of November 2020.

Indexed as

ReadingSchoolsChildChild, PreschoolHumansLearningRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicEmbodied learningMotor-enriched learningPhysically active lessonsPre-reading skillsPreschool childrenWord recognition

Identifiers

PMID33397297
PMCPMC7780667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.