Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33397293›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2021

A dimension reduction technique applied to regression on high dimension, low sample size neurophysiological data sets.

Adrielle C Santana, Adriano V Barbosa, Hani C Yehia, Rafael Laboissière

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adrielle C SantanaGraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos 6627, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. adrielle@ufop.edu.br.ORCID 0000-0003-1457-8930
Adriano V BarbosaGraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos 6627, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1083-8256
Hani C YehiaGraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos 6627, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4578-0525
Rafael LaboissièreUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LPNC UMR 5105, 38000, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2180-9250

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientîfico e Tecnológico PQ 312018/2016-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-03701-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA common problem in neurophysiological signal processing is the extraction of meaningful information from high dimension, low sample size data (HDLSS). We present RoLDSIS (regression on low-dimension spanned input space), a regression technique based on dimensionality reduction that constrains the solution to the subspace spanned by the available observations. This avoids regularization parameters in the regression procedure, as needed in shrinkage regression methods.

resultsWe applied RoLDSIS to the EEG data collected in a phonemic identification experiment. In the experiment, morphed syllables in the continuum /da/-/ta/ were presented as acoustic stimuli to the participants and the event-related potentials (ERP) were recorded and then represented as a set of features in the time-frequency domain via the discrete wavelet transform. Each set of stimuli was chosen from a preliminary identification task executed by the participant. Physical and psychophysical attributes were associated to each stimulus. RoLDSIS was then used to infer the neurophysiological axes, in the feature space, associated with each attribute. We show that these axes can be reliably estimated and that their separation is correlated with the individual strength of phonemic categorization. The results provided by RoLDSIS are interpretable in the time-frequency domain and may be used to infer the neurophysiological correlates of phonemic categorization. A comparison with commonly used regularized regression techniques was carried out by cross-validation.

conclusionThe prediction errors obtained by RoLDSIS are comparable to those obtained with Ridge Regression and smaller than those obtained with LASSO and SPLS. However, RoLDSIS achieves this without the need for cross-validation, a procedure that requires the extraction of a large amount of observations from the data and, consequently, a decreased signal-to-noise ratio when averaging trials. We show that, even though RoLDSIS is a simple technique, it is suitable for the processing and interpretation of neurophysiological signals.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedBrainElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsHumansSample SizeDimension reductionDiscrete wavelet transformElectroencephalographyEvent-related potentialsHigh dimension low sample size problemLinear regressionPhonemic categorization

Identifiers

PMID33397293
PMCPMC7780417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.