ArticleMetabolites2020
Identifying Personalized Metabolic Signatures in Breast Cancer.
Article in Metabolites, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-scale metabolic modeling and machine learning unravel metabolic reprogramming and mast cell role in lung cancer: a multi-level analysis.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- A predictive model for neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2025Article
- Investigating Neuron Degeneration in Huntington's Disease Using RNA-Seq Based Transcriptome Study.Genes · 2023Article
- Identification and Characterization of Metabolic Subtypes of Endometrial Cancer Using a Systems-Level Approach.Metabolites · 2023Article
- Computationally repurposing drugs for breast cancer subtypes using a network-based approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Agent Clustering Strategy Based on Metabolic Flux Distribution and Transcriptome Expression for Novel Drug Development.Biomedicines · 2021Article
- Multi-Omics Model Applied to Cancer Genetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- An Aging-Related Gene Signature-Based Model for Risk Stratification and Prognosis Prediction in Breast Cancer.International journal of women's health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer cells are adept at reprogramming energy metabolism, and the precise manifestation of this metabolic reprogramming exhibits heterogeneity across individuals (and from cell to cell). In this study, we analyzed the metabolic differences between interpersonal heterogeneous cancer phenotypes. We used divergence analysis on gene expression data of 1156 breast normal and tumor samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and integrated this information with a genome-scale reconstruction of human metabolism to generate personalized, context-specific metabolic networks. Using this approach, we classified the samples into four distinct groups based on their metabolic profiles. Enrichment analysis of the subsystems indicated that amino acid metabolism, fatty acid oxidation, citric acid cycle, androgen and estrogen metabolism, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) detoxification distinguished these four groups. Additionally, we developed a workflow to identify potential drugs that can selectively target genes associated with the reactions of interest. MG-132 (a proteasome inhibitor) and OSU-03012 (a celecoxib derivative) were the top-ranking drugs identified from our analysis and known to have anti-tumor activity. Our approach has the potential to provide mechanistic insights into cancer-specific metabolic dependencies, ultimately enabling the identification of potential drug targets for each patient independently, contributing to a rational personalized medicine approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.