Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33396795›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Review of Experimental Studies to Improve Radiotherapy Response in Bladder Cancer: Comments and Perspectives.

Linda Silina, Fatlinda Maksut, Isabelle Bernard-Pierrot, François Radvanyi, Gilles Créhange, Frédérique Mégnin-Chanet, Pierre Verrelle

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Three-in-One Nanozyme for Radiosensitization of Bladder Cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Small-Molecule Polθ Inhibitors Provide Safe and Effective Tumor Radiosensitization in Preclinical Models.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linda SilinaFrench League Against Cancer Team, CNRS UMR144, Curie Institute and PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2382-3400
Fatlinda MaksutCNRS UMR 9187, INSERM U1196, Curie Institute, PSL Research University and Paris-Saclay University, Rue H. Becquerel, 91405 Orsay, France.
Isabelle Bernard-PierrotFrench League Against Cancer Team, CNRS UMR144, Curie Institute and PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France.
François RadvanyiFrench League Against Cancer Team, CNRS UMR144, Curie Institute and PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France.
Gilles CréhangeRadiation Oncology Department, Curie Institute, 75005 Paris, France.
Frédérique Mégnin-ChanetCNRS UMR 9187, INSERM U1196, Curie Institute, PSL Research University and Paris-Saclay University, Rue H. Becquerel, 91405 Orsay, France.
Pierre VerrelleCNRS UMR 9187, INSERM U1196, Curie Institute, PSL Research University and Paris-Saclay University, Rue H. Becquerel, 91405 Orsay, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Curie · FR

Funding

Électricité de France D4008/10.11.16/532Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale FDT201904008237H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 666003SIRIC-Curie INCa-DGOS- 4654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder cancer is among the top ten most common cancer types in the world. Around 25% of all cases are muscle-invasive bladder cancer, for which the gold standard treatment in the absence of metastasis is the cystectomy. In recent years, trimodality treatment associating maximal transurethral resection and radiotherapy combined with concurrent chemotherapy is increasingly used as an organ-preserving alternative. However, the use of this treatment is still limited by the lack of biomarkers predicting tumour response and by a lack of targeted radiosensitising drugs that can improve the therapeutic index, especially by limiting side effects such as bladder fibrosis. In order to improve the bladder-preserving treatment, experimental studies addressing these main issues ought to be considered (both in vitro and in vivo studies). Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews, we conducted a literature search in PubMed on experimental studies investigating how to improve bladder cancer radiotherapy with different radiosensitising agents using a comprehensive search string. We made comments on experimental model selection, experimental design and results, formulating the gaps of knowledge still existing: such as the lack of reliable predictive biomarkers of tumour response to chemoradiation according to the molecular tumour subtype and lack of efficient radiosensitising agents specifically targeting bladder tumour cells. We provided guidance to improve forthcoming studies, such as taking into account molecular characteristics of the preclinical models and highlighted the value of using patient-derived xenografts as well as syngeneic models. Finally, this review could be a useful tool to set up new radiation-based combined treatments with an improved therapeutic index that is needed for bladder preservation.

Indexed as

bladder cancerbladder cancer cell linesmolecular subtypespreclinical studiesradiosensitisationradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33396795
PMCPMC7795454
OpenAlexW3116778754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.