Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33396750›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

COVID-19-Related Fear and Anxiety: Spiritual-Religious Coping in Healthcare Workers in Portugal.

Filipe Prazeres, Lígia Passos, José Augusto Simões, Pedro Simões, Carlos Martins, Andreia Teixeira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Aging and Burnout for Nurses in an Acute Care Setting: The First Wave of COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Religiousness in the first year of COVID-19: A systematic review of empirical research.Current research in ecological and social psychology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Filipe PrazeresFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2849-5194
Lígia PassosCentre for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0659-5258
José Augusto SimõesFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2264-7086
Pedro SimõesFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4692-2003
Carlos MartinsCentre for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8561-5167
Andreia TeixeiraCentre for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1199-2220

Funding

This article was supported by National Funds through FCT-Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., within CINTESIS, R&D Unit (reference UIDB/4255/2020)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected the mental health of the general population, and for healthcare workers (HCWs) it has been no different. Religiosity and spirituality are known coping strategies for mental illnesses, especially in stressful times. This study aimed to describe the role of spiritual-religious coping regarding fear and anxiety in relation to COVID-19 in HCWs in Portugal. A cross-sectional quantitative online survey was performed. Socio-demographic and health data were collected as well as the Duke University Religion Index, Spirituality Scale, Fear of COVID-19 Scale, and Coronavirus Anxiety Scale. Two hundred and twenty-two HCWs participated in the study, 74.3% were female and 81.1% were physicians. The median age was 37 years (Q1, Q3: 31, 51.3). Religiosity was neither a significant factor for coronavirus-related anxiety nor it was for fear of COVID-19. Participants with higher levels in the hope/optimism dimension of the Spirituality Scale showed less coronavirus-related anxiety. Female HCWs, non-physicians, and the ones with a previous history of anxiety presented higher levels of fear and/or anxiety related to COVID-19. HCWs' levels of distress should be identified and reduced, so their work is not impaired.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalFearAdultAnxietyCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPortugalReligionSpiritualityanxietycoping skillsCOVID-19fearhealth personnelreligionspirituality

Identifiers

PMID33396750
PMCPMC7794895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.