Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33396373›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

Lymphedema and Post-Operative Complications after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Lymphadenectomy in Endometrial Carcinomas-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Rianne J A Helgers, Bjorn Winkens, Brigitte F M Slangen, Henrica M J Werner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Application and evaluation of minimally invasive surgical treatment options for early endometrial cancer.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rianne J A HelgersFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bjorn WinkensDepartment of Methodology & Statistics, CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6747-6228
Brigitte F M SlangenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Henrica M J WernerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

endometrial cancerlower-extremity lymphedemalymph node dissectionpost-operative complicationssentinel lymph node

Identifiers

PMID33396373
PMCPMC7795280
OpenAlexW3116949380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.