Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33396312›Full record

ArticleCells2020

Umbilical Cord Tissue as a Source of Young Cells for the Derivation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Using Non-Integrating Episomal Vectors and Feeder-Free Conditions.

Aisha Mohamed, Theresa Chow, Jennifer Whiteley, Amanda Fantin, Kersti Sorra, Ryan Hicks, Ian M Rogers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aisha MohamedLunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
Theresa ChowLunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
Jennifer WhiteleyLunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
Amanda FantinLunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9893-4682
Kersti SorraDepartment of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Ryan HicksBioPharmaceuticals R&D Cell Therapy Department, Research and Early Development, Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolism (CVRM), BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, 431 83 Mölndal, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ian M RogersLunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAAstraZeneca (Sweden) · SELunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical application of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) needs to balance the use of an autologous source that would be a perfect match for the patient against any safety or efficacy issues that might arise with using cells from an older patient or donor. Drs. Takahashi and Yamanaka and the Office of Cellular and Tissue-based Products (PMDA), Japan, have had concerns over the existence of accumulated DNA mutations in the cells of older donors and the possibility of long-term negative effects. To mitigate the risk, they have chosen to partner with the Umbilical Cord (UC) banks in Japan to source allogeneic-matched donor cells. Production of iPSCs from UC blood cells (UCB) has been successful; however, reprogramming blood cells requires cell enrichment with columns or flow cytometry and specialized growth media. These requirements add to the cost of production and increase the manipulation of the cells, which complicates the regulatory approval process. Alternatively, umbilical cord tissue mesenchymal stromal cells (CT-MSCs) have the same advantage as UCB cells of being a source of young donor cells. Crucially, CT-MSCs are easier and less expensive to harvest and grow compared to UCB cells. Here, we demonstrate that CT-MSCs can be easily isolated without expensive enzymatic treatment or columns and reprogramed well using episomal vectors, which allow for the removal of the reprogramming factors after a few passages. Together the data indicates that CT-MSCs are a viable source of donor cells for the production of clinical-grade, patient matched iPSCs.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingAllogeneic CellsBiological Specimen BanksCell Culture TechniquesCell LineageCells, CulturedCellular Reprogramming TechniquesCulture MediaFeeder CellsFetal BloodFlow CytometryHumansImmunohistochemistryInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsKaryotypingCulture Mediaepisomal reprogrammingfeeder freeiPSCmesenchymal stromal cellsumbilical cord tissue

Identifiers

PMID33396312
PMCPMC7824218
OpenAlexW3115714401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.