Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33396287›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2020

Technological Challenges in the Development of Optogenetic Closed-Loop Therapy Approaches in Epilepsy and Related Network Disorders of the Brain.

Bram Vandekerckhove, Jeroen Missinne, Kristl Vonck, Pieter Bauwens, Rik Verplancke, Paul Boon, Robrecht Raedt, Jan Vanfleteren

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. New epilepsy therapies in development.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Quantitative analysis of the optogenetic excitability of CA1 neurons.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bram VandekerckhoveCenter for Microsystems Technology, Imec and Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Jeroen MissinneCenter for Microsystems Technology, Imec and Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3470-620X
Kristl Vonck4Brain Team, Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2671-2650
Pieter BauwensCenter for Microsystems Technology, Imec and Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9398-2485
Rik VerplanckeCenter for Microsystems Technology, Imec and Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Paul Boon4Brain Team, Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Robrecht Raedt4Brain Team, Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8939-0169
Jan VanfleterenCenter for Microsystems Technology, Imec and Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9654-7304
Ghent University · BE

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G.0885.19N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy is a chronic, neurological disorder affecting millions of people every year. The current available pharmacological and surgical treatments are lacking in overall efficacy and cause side-effects like cognitive impairment, depression, tremor, abnormal liver and kidney function. In recent years, the application of optogenetic implants have shown promise to target aberrant neuronal circuits in epilepsy with the advantage of both high spatial and temporal resolution and high cell-specificity, a feature that could tackle both the efficacy and side-effect problems in epilepsy treatment. Optrodes consist of electrodes to record local field potentials and an optical component to modulate neurons via activation of opsin expressed by these neurons. The goal of optogenetics in epilepsy is to interrupt seizure activity in its earliest state, providing a so-called closed-loop therapeutic intervention. The chronic implantation in vivo poses specific demands for the engineering of therapeutic optrodes. Enzymatic degradation and glial encapsulation of implants may compromise long-term recording and sufficient illumination of the opsin-expressing neural tissue. Engineering efforts for optimal optrode design have to be directed towards limitation of the foreign body reaction by reducing the implant's elastic modulus and overall size, while still providing stable long-term recording and large-area illumination, and guaranteeing successful intracerebral implantation. This paper presents an overview of the challenges and recent advances in the field of electrode design, neural-tissue illumination, and neural-probe implantation, with the goal of identifying a suitable candidate to be incorporated in a therapeutic approach for long-term treatment of epilepsy patients.

Indexed as

biocompatibilitybrainclosed-loop therapyepilepsyflexible implantsoptogeneticsoptrode

Identifiers

PMID33396287
PMCPMC7824489
OpenAlexW3115774611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.