Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33396239›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

The Effect of Name and Narrative Voice in Online Adoption Profiles on the Length of Stay of Sheltered Cats in the UK.

Chloe Rix, Mark Westman, Louise Allum, Evelyn Hall, Jessica Pockett, Camilla Pegram, Ruth Serlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chloe RixRoyal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, London AL9 7TA, UK.
Mark WestmanSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7400-1960
Louise AllumRoyal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, London AL9 7TA, UK.
Evelyn HallSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.
Jessica PockettSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.
Camilla PegramRoyal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, London AL9 7TA, UK.
Ruth SerlinRoyal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, London AL9 7TA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prolonged length of stay (LOS) in a rehoming shelter can be detrimental to cat behaviour, health and welfare. Research shows LOS is impacted by animal signalment, behaviour and personality, whether or not previously owned or a stray, and considerations such as cage placement, cage design and the provision of enrichment. A retrospective study was undertaken at a charity organisation that rehomes surrendered and stray cats from three UK shelters. Records from 2011 to 2015, relating to 4460 rehomed cats aged between 1.0 year and 20.1 years old, were analysed to investigate factors that might affect LOS. Univariate and multivariate analysis determined the effects of name, adoption description (first person vs. third person), age and sex on LOS. The final multivariate model demonstrated that age, sex and adoption description, but not name, had a significant effect on LOS. Younger cats, male cats and cats with adoption profiles written in the third person had a significantly shorter mean LOS. Survival curves conducted using a log-rank test and time-to-event analysis, using the dates of relinquishment and rehoming, revealed that cats with a third person description had a shorter LOS. Shelters should consider writing adoption descriptions in the third person to minimise LOS.

Indexed as

adoptioncatslength of stayveterinary sciencewelfare

Identifiers

PMID33396239
PMCPMC7823898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.