Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33396233›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Expectation-Maximization Algorithm for the Calibration of Complex Simulator Using a Gaussian Process Emulator.

Yun Am Seo, Jeong-Soo Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yun Am SeoAI Weather Forecast Research Team, National Institute of Meteorological Sciences, Seogwipo 697-010, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9283-4376
Jeong-Soo ParkDepartment of Statistics, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8460-4869

Funding

BK21 Plus, Ministry of Education, Korea 21A20132212094Korea Meteorological Administration KMA2018-00124National Research Foundation of Korea 2016R1A2B4014518National Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1I1A3069260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The approximated non-linear least squares (ALS) tunes or calibrates the computer model by minimizing the squared error between the computer output and real observations by using an emulator such as a Gaussian process (GP) model. A potential defect of the ALS method is that the emulator is constructed once and it is no longer re-built. An iterative method is proposed in this study to address this difficulty. In the proposed method, the tuning parameters of the simulation model are calculated by the conditional expectation (E-step), whereas the GP parameters are updated by the maximum likelihood estimation (M-step). These EM-steps are alternately repeated until convergence by using both computer and experimental data. For comparative purposes, another iterative method (the max-min algorithm) and a likelihood-based method are considered. Five toy models are tested for a comparative analysis of these methods. According to the toy model study, both the variance and bias of the estimates obtained from the proposed EM algorithm are smaller than those from the existing calibration methods. Finally, the application to a nuclear fusion simulator is demonstrated.

Indexed as

best linear unbiased predictorcode tuningiterative algorithmLatin-hypercube designmean squared errormetamodelnumerical optimizationsurrogate

Identifiers

PMID33396233
PMCPMC7823950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.