Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33395992›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2020

Ascending arousal network connectivity during recovery from traumatic coma.

Samuel B Snider, Yelena G Bodien, Aina Frau-Pascual, Marta Bianciardi, Andrea S Foulkes, Brian L Edlow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Neuroimaging in Disorders of Consciousness and Recovery.Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel B SniderDivisions of Neurocritical Care and Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: ssnider@bwh.harvard.edu.
Yelena G BodienCenter for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States.
Aina Frau-PascualCenter for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States.
Marta BianciardiAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States.
Andrea S FoulkesDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Brian L EdlowCenter for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

The Late Effects of TBI (LETBI) Study: Injury Patterns and Biological Markers of Post-Traumatic NeurodegenerationRF1NS115268 · NINDS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Kristen Dams-O'Connor · 2019 to 2026
$10.3M
A Connectome-Based Clinical Trial Platform to Promote Early Recovery of Consciousness after Traumatic ComaDP2HD101400 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EDLOW, BRIAN L. · 2019 to 2019
$2.5M
Brainstem Network Determinants of Recovery from Traumatic ComaK23NS094538 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EDLOW, BRIAN L. · 2015 to 2019
$994k
In vivo atlas of the ascending arousal system in health and traumatic comaK01EB019474 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BIANCIARDI, MARTA · 2016 to 2019
$691k
Brainstem Connectome Mapping to Guide Targeted Stimulant Therapy in Patients with Traumatic ComaR21NS109627 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EDLOW, BRIAN L. · 2019 to 2020
$480k
NIBIB NIH HHS K01 EB019474NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD101400NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS094538NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS109627NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS115268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is not currently possible to predict which patients will develop chronic disorders of consciousness (DoC) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although the ascending arousal network (AAN) supports human consciousness, it is unknown which AAN pathways must be preserved for patients to recover consciousness.

methodsSixteen patients with acute traumatic coma and 16 matched healthy controls were scanned with high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI). All patients recovered consciousness (Recovery Cohort). Nine were scanned longitudinally: first in the ICU (Acute), then at ≥5 months post-injury (Follow-up). Six separate patients with post-traumatic DoC were scanned ≥5 months post-injury (Chronic DoC Cohort). For each AAN pathway, we computed the median relative change in Acute-to-Follow-up Connectivity Probability (CP) in the Recovery Cohort. We then used Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni correction to compare CP in each AAN pathway in the Recovery Cohort at Follow-up versus the Chronic DoC Cohort. In an exploratory analysis, we used principal component analysis (PCA) to determine whether linear combinations of AAN CP values could separate the Chronic DoC Cohort from the Recovery Cohort and the healthy controls.

resultsIn the Recovery Cohort, the largest relative AAN CP changes were in the brainstem-to-thalamus (median [IQR] = 0.7 [0.09, 0.9]) and forebrain-to-occipital lobe (-0.8 [-0.9, -0.8]) pathways. The AAN connections that differed in the cross-sectional analysis between the Recovery Cohort at Follow-up and the Chronic DoC Cohort included brainstem-to-hypothalamus (W = 53, P

conclusionsWe provide evidence for a longitudinal increase in brainstem-thalamic connectivity during recovery of consciousness after traumatic coma. Cross-sectional analyses revealed that brainstem-hypothalamus, brainstem-temporal lobe, and thalamus-temporal lobe connectivity differed between patients who recovered consciousness and those with a chronic DoC. These observations provide the basis for further investigation into AAN connectivity as a biomarker for recovery of consciousness after traumatic coma.

Indexed as

Coma, Post-Head InjuryArousalConsciousnessConsciousness DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansBrainstemComaConsciousnessMRITraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID33395992
PMCPMC7724378
OpenAlexW3101860778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.