Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33395991›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2020

Neural activity modulations and motor recovery following brain-exoskeleton interface mediated stroke rehabilitation.

Nikunj A Bhagat, Nuray Yozbatiran, Jennifer L Sullivan, Ruta Paranjape, Colin Losey, Zachary Hernandez, Zafer Keser, Robert Grossman, Gerard E Francisco, Marcia K O'Malley and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01948739 nacompletednot on this map

NRI:BMI Control of a Therapeutic Exoskeleton

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonRan2013 to 2018Enrolled18ConditionsStroke, HemiparesisArmsMAHI EXO-II exoskeleton augmented with BMI system
NCT05374486 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

PFI-RP: Smart Co-robot System for Cost-Effective Patient-Centered Robotic Rehabilitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of HoustonRan2022 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsStroke, HemiparesisArmsNeuroExo co-robot neurorehabilitation system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nikunj A BhagatNon-Invasive Brain Machine Interface Systems Laboratory, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA. Electronic address: nabhagat@uh.edu.
Nuray YozbatiranDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, McGovern Medical School, NeuroRecovery Research Center at TIRR Memorial Hermann, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Jennifer L SullivanMechatronics and Haptic Interfaces Laboratory, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Ruta ParanjapeDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, McGovern Medical School, NeuroRecovery Research Center at TIRR Memorial Hermann, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Colin LoseyMechatronics and Haptic Interfaces Laboratory, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Zachary HernandezNon-Invasive Brain Machine Interface Systems Laboratory, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA.
Zafer KeserDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, McGovern Medical School, NeuroRecovery Research Center at TIRR Memorial Hermann, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Robert GrossmanHouston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Gerard E FranciscoDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, McGovern Medical School, NeuroRecovery Research Center at TIRR Memorial Hermann, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Marcia K O'MalleyDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, McGovern Medical School, NeuroRecovery Research Center at TIRR Memorial Hermann, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX 77030, USA; Mechatronics and Haptic Interfaces Laboratory, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Jose L Contreras-VidalNon-Invasive Brain Machine Interface Systems Laboratory, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA; Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA; NSF IUCRC BRAIN, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA.
Interface (United States) · USMemorial Hermann Institute for Rehabilitation and Research Foundation · USHouston Methodist · US

Funding

NRI:BMI Control of a Therapeutic ExoskeletonR01NS081854 · NINDS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI CONTRERAS-VIDAL, JOSE LUIS, FRANCISCO, GERARD E. · 2012 to 2017
$1.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS081854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-machine interfaces (BMI) based on scalp EEG have the potential to promote cortical plasticity following stroke, which has been shown to improve motor recovery outcomes. However, the efficacy of BMI enabled robotic training for upper-limb recovery is seldom quantified using clinical, EEG-based, and kinematics-based metrics. Further, a movement related neural correlate that can predict the extent of motor recovery still remains elusive, which impedes the clinical translation of BMI-based stroke rehabilitation. To address above knowledge gaps, 10 chronic stroke individuals with stable baseline clinical scores were recruited to participate in 12 therapy sessions involving a BMI enabled powered exoskeleton for elbow training. On average, 132 ± 22 repetitions were performed per participant, per session. BMI accuracy across all sessions and subjects was 79 ± 18% with a false positives rate of 23 ± 20%. Post-training clinical assessments found that FMA for upper extremity and ARAT scores significantly improved over baseline by 3.92 ± 3.73 and 5.35 ± 4.62 points, respectively. Also, 80% participants (7 with moderate-mild impairment, 1 with severe impairment) achieved minimal clinically important difference (MCID: FMA-UE >5.2 or ARAT >5.7) during the course of the study. Kinematic measures indicate that, on average, participants' movements became faster and smoother. Moreover, modulations in movement related cortical potentials, an EEG-based neural correlate measured contralateral to the impaired arm, were significantly correlated with ARAT scores (ρ = 0.72, p < 0.05) and marginally correlated with FMA-UE (ρ = 0.63, p = 0.051). This suggests higher activation of ipsi-lesional hemisphere post-intervention or inhibition of competing contra-lesional hemisphere, which may be evidence of neuroplasticity and cortical reorganization following BMI mediated rehabilitation therapy.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceStrokeStroke RehabilitationBrainHumansRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeUpper ExtremityBrain-machine interfaceClinical trialExoskeletonsMovement related cortical potentialsStroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID33395991
PMCPMC7749405
OpenAlexW3103616911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.