Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33395966›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2020

Individualized assessment of residual cognition in patients with disorders of consciousness.

Geoffrey Laforge, Laura E Gonzalez-Lara, Adrian M Owen, Bobby Stojanoski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Clinical Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Residual Language Learning Ability in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Is it time to put rest to rest?Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geoffrey LaforgeThe Brain and Mind Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London ON N6A 5B7, Canada. Electronic address: glaforge@uwo.ca.
Laura E Gonzalez-LaraThe Brain and Mind Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London ON N6A 5B7, Canada.
Adrian M OwenThe Brain and Mind Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London ON N6A 5B7, Canada; The Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London ON N6A 5B7, Canada; The Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, The University of Western Ontario, London ON N6A 5B7, Canada.
Bobby StojanoskiThe Brain and Mind Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London ON N6A 5B7, Canada; The Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London ON N6A 5B7, Canada.
Western University · CA

Funding

CIHR 300292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients diagnosed with disorders of consciousness show minimal or inconsistent behavioural evidence of conscious awareness. However, using functional neuroimaging, recent research in clinical neuroscience has identified a subpopulation of these patients who reliably produce neural markers indicative of awareness. In this study, we recorded electroencephalograms during a response-free movie task to assess narrative processing in patients with disorders of consciousness. Thirteen patients diagnosed with a disorder of consciousness and 28 healthy controls participated in this study. We designed a movie-watching/listening paradigm involving two suspenseful movie clips, one audiovisual and one audio-only, and used electroencephalography to extract patterns of brain activity that were maximally correlated between subjects. These activity patterns served as electrophysiological indices of narrative processing, which were compared to the neural responses of patients during the same movies. Our analysis revealed two patterns of neural activity, one for each movie condition, that were significantly and reliably correlated between healthy participants. Of the twelve patients who watched the audiovisual movie, 25% produced a pattern of activity that was significantly correlated with the healthy group, while of the ten who listened to the audio narrative, 30% produced electrophysiological patterns similar to controls (one patient responded appropriately to both). The method presented here allows for rapid bedside assessment of higher-order cognitive processing in patients with disorders of consciousness. By leveraging the common neural response to movie stimuli, we were able to identify comparable patterns of brain activity in individual, behaviourally non-responsive patients, reflecting a capacity for narrative processing.

Indexed as

BrainConsciousnessCognitionConsciousness DisordersElectroencephalographyFunctional NeuroimagingHumansComponents analysisDisorders of consciousnessElectroencephalographyNaturalistic stimuli

Identifiers

PMID33395966
PMCPMC7652775
OpenAlexW3094523523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.