ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2020
Giant cell tumor of bone at the proximal epiphysis of humerus in a skeletally immature patient: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGiant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in skeletally immature (SI) patients are rare benign lesions that have locally aggressive growth pattern and high risk of recurrence. The presence of GCTB at the proximal epiphysis of humerus in SI patients has never been described in literature. PRESENTATION OF CASE: This report shows the case of a 10-year-old SI male who presented with a GCTB at the proximal epiphysis of humerus that was treated with curettage, cement and adjuvant therapy. DISCUSSION: The presence of a lytic growing lesion at the proximal humerus in a SI patient should alert clinicians to consider GCTB in their differential diagnosis. The management of GCTB in SI patients is challenging for orthopaedic surgeons. Tumor resection with cementation and adjuvant therapy has been described as a method rationale to prevent the recurrence and preserve the joint function in SI patients with GCTB at the proximal epiphysis of humerus. Clinicians should continue to monitor these patients with radiographic imaging for possible recurrence, metastasis or growth plate injury.
conclusionTumor resection with cementation and adjuvant therapy offers a treatment alternative to prevent the recurrence and preserve the joint function in SI patients with GCTB at the proximal epiphysis of humerus. The use of a prothesis in a SI patient should avoided if possible, to prevent implant-related complications and damage to the growth plate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.