Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33395544›Full record

SynthesisAnnual review of public health2021

The Effects of Home Care Provider Mix on the Care Recipient: An International, Systematic Review of Articles from 2000 to 2020.

Norma B Coe, R Tamara Konetzka, Melissa Berkowitz, Emily Blecker, Courtney H Van Houtven

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annual review of public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The mental health implications of informal care receipt stability among older adults with persistent care needs.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Association of Caregiving Receipt With Mental Health Utilization in a National Cohort of Older Adults.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Family spillovers and long-term care insurance.Journal of health economics · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Examining Consequences Related to Unmet Care Needs Across the Long-Term Care Continuum.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Norma B CoeDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4884, USA; email: nbcoe@pennmedicine.upenn.edu, Melissa.Berkowitz@pennmedicine.upenn.edu, Emily.Blecker@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
R Tamara KonetzkaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637-1447, USA; email: konetzka@uchicago.edu.
Melissa BerkowitzDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4884, USA; email: nbcoe@pennmedicine.upenn.edu, Melissa.Berkowitz@pennmedicine.upenn.edu, Emily.Blecker@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Emily BleckerDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4884, USA; email: nbcoe@pennmedicine.upenn.edu, Melissa.Berkowitz@pennmedicine.upenn.edu, Emily.Blecker@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Courtney H Van HoutvenDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA; email: Courtney.VanHoutven@duke.edu.

Funding

Effects of Informal Care for persons with Alzheimer's Disease and related dementiasR01AG057501 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COE, NORMA B · 2017 to 2020
$2.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this systematic review, we examine the literature from 2000 to 2020 to ascertain whether we can make strong conclusions about the relative benefit of adding informal care or formal care providers to the care mix among individuals receiving care in the home, specifically focusing on care recipient outcomes. We evaluate how informal care and formal care affect (or are associated with) health care use of care recipients, health care costs of care recipients, and health outcomes of care recipients. The literature to date suggests that informal care, either alone or in concert with formal care, delivers improvements in the health and well-being of older adults receiving care. The conclusions one can draw about the effects of formal care are less clear.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareHome Care ServicesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topiccare recipient outcomesformal carehealth care costshealth care usehealth outcomeshome careinformal carewell-being

Identifiers

PMID33395544
PMCPMC8190630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.