Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33395449›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Consolidated Framework for Collaboration Research derived from a systematic review of theories, models, frameworks and principles for cross-sector collaboration.

Larissa Calancie, Leah Frerichs, Melinda M Davis, Eliana Sullivan, Ann Marie White, Dorothy Cilenti, Giselle Corbie-Smith, Kristen Hassmiller Lich

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Larissa CalancieFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8943-5590
Leah FrerichsDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Melinda M DavisOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America.
Eliana SullivanOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America.
Ann Marie WhiteDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Dorothy CilentiDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, National Maternal and Child Health Workforce Development Center, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Giselle Corbie-SmithDepartments of Social Medicine and Internal Medicine, UNC Center for Health Equity Research, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Kristen Hassmiller LichDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.

Funding

Identifying and Disentangling Social and Physical Environmental Effects on Physical Activity in Diverse Adolescent and Young Adult PopulationsK01HL138159 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FRERICHS, LEAH M. · 2017 to 2021
$780k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL138159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-sector collaboration is needed to address root causes of persistent public health challenges. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify studies describing theories, models, frameworks and principles for cross-sector collaboration and synthesized collaboration constructs into the Consolidated Framework for Collaboration Research (CFCR). Ninety-five articles were included in the review. Constructs were abstracted from articles and grouped into seven domains within the framework: community context; group composition; structure and internal processes; group dynamics; social capital; activities that influence or take place within the collaboration; activities that influence or take place within the broader community; and activities that influence or take place both in the collaboration and in the community. Community engagement strategies employed by collaborations are discussed, as well as recommendations for using systems science methods for testing specific mechanisms of how constructs identified in the review influence one another. Researchers, funders, and collaboration members can use the consolidated framework to articulate components of collaboration and test mechanisms explaining how collaborations function. By working from a consolidated framework of collaboration terms and using systems science methods, researchers can advance evidence for the efficacy of cross-sector collaborations.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorModels, TheoreticalDatabases, FactualHumansInterprofessional RelationsPeer Review, Research

Identifiers

PMID33395449
PMCPMC7781480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.