Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33395435›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Natural arbovirus infection rate and detectability of indoor female Aedes aegypti from Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico.

Oscar David Kirstein, Guadalupe Ayora-Talavera, Edgar Koyoc-Cardeña, Daniel Chan Espinoza, Azael Che-Mendoza, Azael Cohuo-Rodriguez, Pilar Granja-Pérez, Henry Puerta-Guardo, Norma Pavia-Ruz, Mike W Dunbar and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04343521 (Quantifying the Epidemiological Impact of Targeted Indoor Residual Spraying on Aedes-borne Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04343521 nacompletednot on this map

Quantifying the Epidemiological Impact of Targeted Indoor Residual Spraying on Aedes-borne Diseases

TypeinterventionalSponsorEmory UniversityRan2020 to 2024Enrolled4,461ConditionsAedes-borne Diseases, Dengue, Chikungunya, ZikaArmsTargeted Indoor Residual Spraying (TIRS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Oscar David KirsteinDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4765-7483
Guadalupe Ayora-TalaveraLaboratorio de Virología. Centro de Investigaciones Regionales "Dr. Hideyo Noguchi", Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México.ORCID 0000-0002-2829-6945
Edgar Koyoc-CardeñaUnidad Colaborativa de Bioensayos Entomológicos, Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Daniel Chan EspinozaUnidad Colaborativa de Bioensayos Entomológicos, Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México.ORCID 0000-0003-2736-0877
Azael Che-MendozaUnidad Colaborativa de Bioensayos Entomológicos, Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México.ORCID 0000-0001-9954-3678
Azael Cohuo-RodriguezUnidad Colaborativa de Bioensayos Entomológicos, Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Pilar Granja-PérezLaboratorio Estatal de Salud Pública, Servicios de Salud de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Henry Puerta-GuardoUnidad Colaborativa de Bioensayos Entomológicos, Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Norma Pavia-RuzLaboratorio de Hematología. Centro de Investigaciones Regionales "Dr. Hideyo Noguchi", Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Mike W DunbarDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Pablo Manrique-SaideUnidad Colaborativa de Bioensayos Entomológicos, Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Gonzalo M Vazquez-ProkopecDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0710-270X
Autonomous University of Yucatán · MXEmory University · USSecretaría de Investigación, Innovación y Educación Superior · MX

Funding

Quanitifying the Epidemiological Impact of Targeted Indoor Residual Spraying on Aedes-borne DiseasesU01AI148069 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI VAZQUEZ PROKOPEC, GONZALO MARTIN · 2020 to 2024
$6.4M
CIHRNIAID NIH HHS U01 AI148069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arbovirus infection in Aedes aegypti has historically been quantified from a sample of the adult population by pooling collected mosquitoes to increase detectability. However, there is a significant knowledge gap about the magnitude of natural arbovirus infection within areas of active transmission, as well as the sensitivity of detection of such an approach. We used indoor Ae. aegypti sequential sampling with Prokopack aspirators to collect all mosquitoes inside 200 houses with suspected active ABV transmission from the city of Mérida, Mexico, and tested all collected specimens by RT-PCR to quantify: a) the absolute arbovirus infection rate in individually tested Ae. aegypti females; b) the sensitivity of using Prokopack aspirators in detecting ABV-infected mosquitoes; and c) the sensitivity of entomological inoculation rate (EIR) and vectorial capacity (VC), two measures ABV transmission potential, to different estimates of indoor Ae. aegypti abundance. The total number of Ae. aegypti (total catch, the sum of all Ae. aegypti across all collection intervals) as well as the number on the first 10-min of collection (sample, equivalent to a routine adult aspiration session) were calculated. We individually tested by RT-PCR 2,161 Aedes aegypti females and found that 7.7% of them were positive to any ABV. Most infections were CHIKV (77.7%), followed by DENV (11.4%) and ZIKV (9.0%). The distribution of infected Aedes aegypti was overdispersed; 33% houses contributed 81% of the infected mosquitoes. A significant association between ABV infection and Ae. aegypti total catch indoors was found (binomial GLMM, Odds Ratio > 1). A 10-min indoor Prokopack collection led to a low sensitivity of detecting ABV infection (16.3% for detecting infected mosquitoes and 23.4% for detecting infected houses). When averaged across all infested houses, mean EIR ranged between 0.04 and 0.06 infective bites per person per day, and mean VC was 0.6 infectious vectors generated from a population feeding on a single infected host per house/day. Both measures were significantly and positively associated with Ae. aegypti total catch indoors. Our findings provide evidence that the accurate estimation and quantification of arbovirus infection rate and transmission risk is a function of the sampling effort, the local abundance of Aedes aegypti and the intensity of arbovirus circulation.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsArbovirus InfectionsFemaleMaleMosquito VectorsPopulation Density

Identifiers

PMID33395435
PMCPMC7781390
OpenAlexW3119509135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.