Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33395421›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with confirmed Zika Virus infection in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: A cohort study.

Juliana P Souza, Maria Dalva B B Méio, Laura Medeiros de Andrade, Mirza R Figueiredo, Saint Clair Gomes Junior, Jose Paulo Pereira Junior, Elizabeth Brickley, Maria Elisabeth Lopes Moreira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Juliana P SouzaInstituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira-IFF/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maria Dalva B B MéioInstituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira-IFF/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Laura Medeiros de AndradeInstituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira-IFF/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Mirza R FigueiredoInstituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira-IFF/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Saint Clair Gomes JuniorInstituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira-IFF/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1554-943X
Jose Paulo Pereira JuniorInstituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira-IFF/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Elizabeth BrickleyAssistant Professor of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population, London School Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Maria Elisabeth Lopes MoreiraInstituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira-IFF/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2034-0294
Instituto Nacional de Saúde · MZLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes of Zika virus infection by the timing of infection during pregnancy. Method: Cohort study of 190 pregnancies with 193 offspring with a positive RT-PCR test for Zika virus (March/2016 to April/2017).

resultsDeath or defects related to congenital Zika virus infection were identified in 37.3% of fetuses and newborns, and microcephaly in 21.4% of the newborns. The proportion of small for gestational age newborns was 21.9%. Maternal symptoms in the first trimester were significantly associated with the birth of newborns with microcephaly/cerebral atrophy, small for gestational age and with the deaths (one abortion, one stillbirth and the two neonatal deaths). Maternal infection during the second trimester was further associated with asymptomatic newborns at birth. The study showed that 58.5% of the offspring with microcephaly and / or cortical atrophy were small for gestational age, with an evident decrease in symptomatic offspring without microcephaly, 24.1%, and with only 9.1% in the asymptomatic group.

conclusionThis study showed that the earlier the symptoms appear during gestation, the more severe the endpoints. We found a higher percentage of small for gestational age newborns exposed to Zika virus early in gestation. We also found a group of apparently asymptomatic newborns with proven Zika infection, which highlights the importance of follow up studies in this population.

Indexed as

AdultBrazilCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFetal DiseasesFetusFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesMicrocephalyPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousZika VirusZika Virus Infection

Identifiers

PMID33395421
PMCPMC7781387
OpenAlexW3119307846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.