Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33395406›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2021

Accurate genetic and environmental covariance estimation with composite likelihood in genome-wide association studies.

Boran Gao, Can Yang, Jin Liu, Xiang Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. GWAS on birth year infant mortality rates provides evidence of recent natural selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Genetic parameters in traits of productive importance in lines of Bombyx mori L.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Estimating genetic nurture with summary statistics of multigenerational genome-wide association studies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Boran GaoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8620-0534
Can YangDepartment of Mathematics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4407-3055
Jin LiuCentre for Quantitative Medicine, Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-5707-2078
Xiang ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4331-7599

Funding

Statistical Methods for Modeling Polygenic Architecture in Association and Re-sequencing StudiesR01HG009124 · NHGRI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Xiang Zhou · 2017 to 2026
$3.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic and environmental covariances between pairs of complex traits are important quantitative measurements that characterize their shared genetic and environmental architectures. Accurate estimation of genetic and environmental covariances in genome-wide association studies (GWASs) can help us identify common genetic and environmental factors associated with both traits and facilitate the investigation of their causal relationship. Genetic and environmental covariances are often modeled through multivariate linear mixed models. Existing algorithms for covariance estimation include the traditional restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method and the recent method of moments (MoM). Compared to REML, MoM approaches are computationally efficient and require only GWAS summary statistics. However, MoM approaches can be statistically inefficient, often yielding inaccurate covariance estimates. In addition, existing MoM approaches have so far focused on estimating genetic covariance and have largely ignored environmental covariance estimation. Here we introduce a new computational method, GECKO, for estimating both genetic and environmental covariances, that improves the estimation accuracy of MoM while keeping computation in check. GECKO is based on composite likelihood, relies on only summary statistics for scalable computation, provides accurate genetic and environmental covariance estimates across a range of scenarios, and can accommodate SNP annotation stratified covariance estimation. We illustrate the benefits of GECKO through simulations and applications on analyzing 22 traits from five large-scale GWASs. In the real data applications, GECKO identified 50 significant genetic covariances among analyzed trait pairs, resulting in a twofold power gain compared to the previous MoM method LDSC. In addition, GECKO identified 20 significant environmental covariances. The ability of GECKO to estimate environmental covariance in addition to genetic covariance helps us reveal strong positive correlation between the genetic and environmental covariance estimates across trait pairs, suggesting that common pathways may underlie the shared genetic and environmental architectures between traits.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionLikelihood FunctionsAlgorithmsBreedingComputer SimulationGenomeGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansModels, GeneticPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID33395406
PMCPMC7808654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.