Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33394748›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pulmonary medicine2021

How might endotyping guide chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment? Current understanding, knowledge gaps and future research needs.

Robert M Burkes, Ralph J Panos, Michael T Borchers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The impact of body mass index on mortality in COPD: an updated dose-response meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert M BurkesUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine.
Ralph J PanosUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine.
Michael T BorchersUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine.

Funding

Natural Killer Cell Functions in LymphangioleiomyomatosisR01HL141236 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI BORCHERS, MICHAEL · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
Natural Killer Cell Subpopulations in COPD ExacerbationsI01CX001891 · VA · CINCINNATI VA MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH · PI BORCHERS, MICHAEL · 2021 to 2024
–
CSRD VA I01 CX001891NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review discusses emerging therapies directed at chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) endotypes and pathobiological processes that manifest as the disease. RECENT

findingsSpecific endotypes have been targeted in COPD. These include eosinophilic inflammation, overproduction of interleukin-17, chronic bronchitis and altered nature of mucous, and chronic infection. Therapies exactly directed at the cause of these endotypes or their resultant clinical findings have been assessed. Although some intermediate outcomes have seemed promising, there have been no findings that shift the paradigm of COPD therapy. SUMMARY: Basic and clinical scientists continue to define endotypes that may be directly addressed with therapeutics. As of the time of this up-to-date review, there is yet to be an endotype-directed therapy to demonstrate great clinical effect.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveHumans

Identifiers

PMID33394748
PMCPMC8480198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.