ReviewHippocampus2021
Goal-directed interaction of stimulus and task demand in the parahippocampal region.
Review in Hippocampus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Encoding Patterned Spatial Behavior in the Subiculum.Hippocampus · 2026Review
- Complementary roles of the human perirhinal and the entorhinal cortex in the hippocampal retrieval of episodic memory.iScience · 2025Article
- Abnormal topological properties and functional-structural coupling of large-scale brain networks in primary angle-closure glaucoma.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Between similarity and difference: network dynamics of the hippocampal- parahippocampal circuitry in pattern separation of male Wistar rats.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Article
- The features analysis of hemoglobin expression on visual information transmission pathway in early stage of Alzheimer's disease.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Association between gaming disorder and regional homogeneity in highly involved male adult gamers: A pilot resting-state fMRI study.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
- Cholinergic basal forebrain atrophy in Parkinson's disease with freezing of gait.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023Article
- Content-specific vulnerability of recent episodic memories in Alzheimer's disease.Neuropsychologia · 2021Article
- Goal-directed interaction of stimulus and task demand in the parahippocampal region.Hippocampus · 2021Review
- Reunification of Object and View-Center Background Information in the Primate Medial Temporal Lobe.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hippocampus and parahippocampal region are essential for representing episodic memories involving various spatial locations and objects, and for using those memories for future adaptive behavior. The "dual-stream model" was initially formulated based on anatomical characteristics of the medial temporal lobe, dividing the parahippocampal region into two streams that separately process and relay spatial and nonspatial information to the hippocampus. Despite its significance, the dual-stream model in its original form cannot explain recent experimental results, and many researchers have recognized the need for a modification of the model. Here, we argue that dividing the parahippocampal region into spatial and nonspatial streams a priori may be too simplistic, particularly in light of ambiguous situations in which a sensory cue alone (e.g., visual scene) may not allow such a definitive categorization. Upon reviewing evidence, including our own, that reveals the importance of goal-directed behavioral responses in determining the relative involvement of the parahippocampal processing streams, we propose the Goal-directed Interaction of Stimulus and Task-demand (GIST) model. In the GIST model, input stimuli such as visual scenes and objects are first processed by both the postrhinal and perirhinal cortices-the postrhinal cortex more heavily involved with visual scenes and perirhinal cortex with objects-with relatively little dependence on behavioral task demand. However, once perceptual ambiguities are resolved and the scenes and objects are identified and recognized, the information is then processed through the medial or lateral entorhinal cortex, depending on whether it is used to fulfill navigational or non-navigational goals, respectively. As complex sensory stimuli are utilized for both navigational and non-navigational purposes in an intermixed fashion in naturalistic settings, the hippocampus may be required to then put together these experiences into a coherent map to allow flexible cognitive operations for adaptive behavior to occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.