Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33394547›Full record

ReviewHippocampus2021

Goal-directed interaction of stimulus and task demand in the parahippocampal region.

Su-Min Lee, Seung-Woo Jin, Seong-Beom Park, Eun-Hye Park, Choong-Hee Lee, Hyun-Woo Lee, Heung-Yeol Lim, Seung-Woo Yoo, Jae Rong Ahn, Jhoseph Shin and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hippocampus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cholinergic basal forebrain atrophy in Parkinson's disease with freezing of gait.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Su-Min LeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung-Woo JinDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Seong-Beom ParkDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Eun-Hye ParkDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Choong-Hee LeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyun-Woo LeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Heung-Yeol LimDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung-Woo YooDepartment of Biomedical Science, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Brain Institute, Florida Atlantic University, Jupiter, Florida, USA.
Jae Rong AhnDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA.
Jhoseph ShinDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Sang Ah LeeDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea.
Inah LeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3760-4257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hippocampus and parahippocampal region are essential for representing episodic memories involving various spatial locations and objects, and for using those memories for future adaptive behavior. The "dual-stream model" was initially formulated based on anatomical characteristics of the medial temporal lobe, dividing the parahippocampal region into two streams that separately process and relay spatial and nonspatial information to the hippocampus. Despite its significance, the dual-stream model in its original form cannot explain recent experimental results, and many researchers have recognized the need for a modification of the model. Here, we argue that dividing the parahippocampal region into spatial and nonspatial streams a priori may be too simplistic, particularly in light of ambiguous situations in which a sensory cue alone (e.g., visual scene) may not allow such a definitive categorization. Upon reviewing evidence, including our own, that reveals the importance of goal-directed behavioral responses in determining the relative involvement of the parahippocampal processing streams, we propose the Goal-directed Interaction of Stimulus and Task-demand (GIST) model. In the GIST model, input stimuli such as visual scenes and objects are first processed by both the postrhinal and perirhinal cortices-the postrhinal cortex more heavily involved with visual scenes and perirhinal cortex with objects-with relatively little dependence on behavioral task demand. However, once perceptual ambiguities are resolved and the scenes and objects are identified and recognized, the information is then processed through the medial or lateral entorhinal cortex, depending on whether it is used to fulfill navigational or non-navigational goals, respectively. As complex sensory stimuli are utilized for both navigational and non-navigational purposes in an intermixed fashion in naturalistic settings, the hippocampus may be required to then put together these experiences into a coherent map to allow flexible cognitive operations for adaptive behavior to occur.

Indexed as

GoalsPerirhinal CortexEntorhinal CortexHippocampusNeural PathwaysParahippocampal GyrusTemporal Lobeentorhinal cortexepisodic memoryhippocampusobject recognitionparahippocampal regionperirhinal cortexpostrhinal cortexscene perceptionspatial navigation

Identifiers

PMID33394547
PMCPMC8359334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.