Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33394523›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2021

Association between age at first reported e-cigarette use and subsequent regular e-cigarette, ever cigarette and regular cigarette use.

Mark Conner, Sarah Grogan, Ruth Simms-Ellis, Lisa Cowap, Christopher J Armitage, Robert West, Anna-Marie Marshall, Kamran Siddiqi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mark ConnerSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6229-8143
Sarah GroganDepartment of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Ruth Simms-EllisSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Lisa CowapCentre for Psychological Research, Science Centre, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Christopher J ArmitageManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Robert WestInstitute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Anna-Marie MarshallDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Kamran SiddiqiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1529-7778

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J000264/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAssociation of electronic cigarette use and subsequent smoking has received considerable attention, although age of first use has not. This study tested differences in regular (e-cigarettes, cigarettes) and ever (cigarettes) use between e-cigarette user groups: early versus never users, late versus never users, early versus late users and effects of controlling for covariates.

designProspective study with 12- and 24-month follow-up of e-cigarette/cigarette ever/regular use with data from an intervention.

settingForty-five schools in England (Staffordshire and Yorkshire).

participantsNever smokers (3289 13-14-year-olds) who were part of a cluster randomized controlled trial. MEASUREMENTS: The sample was divided into groups of e-cigarette users: early users (at 13-14 years), late users (at 14-15 years) and never users (at 13-14 and 14-15 years). Dependent variables were self-reported regular e-cigarette and cigarette use and ever cigarette use at 15-16 years. Covariates were assessed.

findingsEarly and late users compared with never users were significantly more likely to be regular e-cigarette users [early: odds ratio (OR) = 9.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.38, 16.49, P < 0.001; late: OR = 6.89, 95% CI = 4.11, 11.54, P < 0.001], ever cigarette users (early: OR = 7.96, 95% CI = 6.02, 10.53, P < 0.001; late: OR = 5.13, 95% CI = 3.85, 6.84, P < 0.001) and regular cigarette users (early: OR = 7.80, 95% CI = 3.99, 15.27, P < 0.001; late: OR = 4.34, 95% CI = 1.93, 9.77, P < 0.001) at age 15-16 years. Late users compared with early users had significantly lower rates of ever use of cigarettes at 15-16 years (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.35, 0.66, P < 0.001), although this difference was non-significant at 12 months after first use of e-cigarettes (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.64, 1.25, P = 0.498). Controlling for covariates did not change the findings.

conclusionsAdolescents in England who report using e-cigarettes at age 13-14 years have higher rates of subsequently initiating cigarette use than adolescents who report using e-cigarettes at age 14-15 years, a difference that may be attributable to a longer period of time to initiate cigarette use in former group.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsVapingAdolescentHumansProspective StudiesSmokingAdolescentsE-cigaretteselectronic nicotine delivery systemsharm reductioninterventionsmoking

Identifiers

PMID33394523
PMCPMC8609424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.