ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Yangtze River Economic Belt environmental remediation efficiency based on an input-output optimization analysis.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Industrial Structure Upgrading on Green Total Factor Productivity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Research on Environmental Regulation and Green Total Factor Productivity in Yangtze River Delta: From the Perspective of Financial Development.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Research on Green Total Factor Productivity of Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on Environmental Regulation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Yangtze River Basin Environmental Regulation Efficiency Based on the Empirical Analysis of 97 Cities from 2005 to 2016.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) has been metaphorized as China's "arrow" to the world as it generates nearly half of the nation's gross domestic product, the region has also suffered immense environmental degradation during its development process. This paper uses environmental data from 2003 to 2013 of the YREB's nine provinces and two municipalities and investigates environmental remediation efficiency for the region. Results illustrate that (1) the efficiency of the YREB is very low as over the study period, only three provinces had mean environmental remediation values that could be classified as "effective," leaving the remaining six provinces and two municipalities as "ineffective"; (2) environmental efficiencies of the studied provinces and municipalities became increasingly polarized; (3) from 2003 to 2013, environmental efficiencies in the region have deteriorated; (4) the principal reason for environmental remediation ineffectiveness was due to a combination of redundant resource investments, excessive pollutant discharge, low industrial waste comprehensive utilization ratios, and non-municipal environmental remediation standards. To illuminate development pathways for the ineffective provinces and municipalities of the YREB, essential factors in the optimization of economic management investments are proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33394439What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.