Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33394426›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Possibilities of disposing silica fume and waste glass powder, which are environmental wastes, by using as a substitute for Portland cement.

Oguzhan Yavuz Bayraktar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The potential of using Cedrus atlantica as a biomonitor in the concentrations of Cr and Mn.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Oguzhan Yavuz BayraktarFaculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Civil Engineering, Kastamonu University, Kuzeykent, Kastamonu, Turkey. obayraktar@kastamonu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0578-6965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the possibilities of disposal of environmental waste, silica fume, and waste glass powder as substitutes in the mortar samples in Portland cement were investigated. For this purpose, Portland cement (CEM I), silica fume (SF), waste glass powder (WGP), CEN standard sand, and water were used in mortar production. Additive cements were obtained by using the SF, WGP, and SFWGP substitution methods in Portland cement at the rates of 10, 20, 30, and 40%. The flexural strength, compressive strength, radiation permeability (determination of linear absorption coefficient), high temperature, and alkali-silica reaction (ASR) effect on SF, WGP, and SFWGP were examined and compared with the control PC 42.5R samples. Mortar samples of 40 × 40 × 160 mm size were obtained with the grouts/mortars produced, and the samples were exposed to five temperature effects, namely, 20, 150, 300, 700, and 1000 ° C. Samples kept at 20 ° C are accepted as baseline. A total of 429 samples were studied, including the cooling process in the air (spontaneously in the laboratory, 20 ° C ± 2). After the samples achieved room temperature, flexural and compressive strength tests were carried out at 28 and 90 days. Test results demonstrate that SF, WGP, and SFWGP, which are environmental wastes, can be disposed both as a pozzolanic additive material both alone and together in cement mortars, can be utilized in buildings with high fire hazard, and the sample with the highest linear absorption coefficient is the sample obtained with SFWGP, and also, the expansion values ​​that occur in SF and WGP are less than the control sample.

Indexed as

Construction MaterialsSilicon DioxideCompressive StrengthGlassPowdersPowdersSilicon DioxideAlkali-silica reactionHigh temperaturePortland cementRadiation permeabilitySilica fumeWaste glass powder

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.