Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33394388›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2021

RippleNet: a Recurrent Neural Network for Sharp Wave Ripple (SPW-R) Detection.

Espen Hagen, Anna R Chambers, Gaute T Einevoll, Klas H Pettersen, Rune Enger, Alexander J Stasik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Networks through the lens of high-frequency oscillations.Frontiers in network physiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Analysis of Diabetes Clinical Data Based on Recurrent Neural Networks.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Espen HagenFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway. espenhgn@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1321-5970
Anna R ChambersDivision of Physiology, Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2737-0637
Gaute T EinevollFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5425-5012
Klas H PettersenNORA - Norwegian Artificial Intelligence Research Consortium, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3078-3301
Rune EngerDivision of Anatomy, Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9418-7117
Alexander J StasikDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. a.j.stasik@fys.uio.no.ORCID 0000-0003-1646-2472

Funding

SODIUM CHANNEL DIVERSITY IN THE DORSAL ROOT GANGLIONF32NS009021 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI MOSS, BRENDA LYNN · 1991 to 1994
–
NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS009021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hippocampal sharp wave ripples (SPW-R) have been identified as key bio-markers of important brain functions such as memory consolidation and decision making. Understanding their underlying mechanisms in healthy and pathological brain function and behaviour rely on accurate SPW-R detection. In this multidisciplinary study, we propose a novel, self-improving artificial intelligence (AI) detection method in the form of deep Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) with Long Short-Term memory (LSTM) layers that can learn features of SPW-R events from raw, labeled input data. The approach contrasts conventional routines that typically relies on hand-crafted, heuristic feature extraction and often laborious manual curation. The algorithm is trained using supervised learning on hand-curated data sets with SPW-R events obtained under controlled conditions. The input to the algorithm is the local field potential (LFP), the low-frequency part of extracellularly recorded electric potentials from the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Its output predictions can be interpreted as time-varying probabilities of SPW-R events for the duration of the inputs. A simple thresholding applied to the output probabilities is found to identify times of SPW-R events with high precision. The non-causal, or bidirectional variant of the proposed algorithm demonstrates consistently better accuracy compared to the causal, or unidirectional counterpart. Reference implementations of the algorithm, named 'RippleNet', are open source, freely available, and implemented using a common open-source framework for neural networks (tensorflow.keras) and can be easily incorporated into existing data analysis workflows for processing experimental data.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHippocampusAction PotentialsNeural Networks, ComputerDeep learningHippocampus CA1Machine learningNeuroscienceRecurrent neural networksSharp wave ripples (SPW-R)

Identifiers

PMID33394388
PMCPMC8233255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.