Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33394348›Full record

ArticleJournal of nephrology2021

Renal histology across the stages of chronic kidney disease.

Francesco Trevisani, Federico Di Marco, Umberto Capitanio, Giacomo Dell'Antonio, Alessandra Cinque, Alessandro Larcher, Roberta Lucianò, Arianna Bettiga, Riccardo Vago, Alberto Briganti and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. βBiochemistry research international · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco TrevisaniUnit of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Federico Di MarcoUrological Research Institute (URI), Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Umberto CapitanioUnit of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giacomo Dell'AntonioUnit of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra CinqueUrological Research Institute (URI), Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro LarcherUnit of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Roberta LucianòUnit of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Arianna BettigaUrological Research Institute (URI), Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Riccardo VagoUrological Research Institute (URI), Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alberto BrigantiUnit of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Andrea SaloniaUnit of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Francesco MontorsiUnit of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Esteban PorriniFacultad de Medicina, ITB: Instituto de Tecnologías Biomédicas, Universidad de La Laguna, 38320, La Laguna, Spain. esteban.l.porrini@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3056-4662
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITUniversidad de La Laguna · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification represents a simple tool to evaluate kidney disease. However, it is not based on kidney histology and this might limit the correlation between renal function and histological damage. The aim of this study was to examine the presence and magnitude of the discordance between CKD classification and kidney histology. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed kidney parenchyma histology in a cohort of 200 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for a kidney mass to observe its correlation with CKD classification. Kidney tissue of the unaffected part of the removed kidney was analyzed and classified with a chronicity score as described by Sethi et al. Then, all patients were classified according to the respective CKD stage using different equations: CKD-EPI, MDRD, FAS and MCQ.

resultsMedian age was 67 (57-75). Diabetes, hypertension and overweight were observed in 23%, 60% and 61%, respectively. The CKD-EPI equation stratified 30.5% (n = 61) of the subjects into CKD stage 1, 41.5% (n = 83) into CKD stage 2, 25.5% into CKD stage 3 (n = 51) and 2.5% into CKD stage 4-5 (n = 5). About 30-40% of the patients with CKD stage 3 had mild or no lesions in the histological evaluation (Chronicity Score = 0-1), whereas 7-10% of those with CKD stage 1 had moderate or severe histological lesions (Chronicity Score ≥ 3). Different patients with the same value of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) had either severe or no histological damage.

conclusionsThe variability of kidney histology observed within each CKD stage is not negligible. This may limit the reliability of the current CKD classification. More research is needed to clarify the relationship between CKD stages and kidney damage.

Indexed as

Renal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedCreatinineGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKidneyReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesCreatinineChronicity scoreChronic kidney diseaseeGFRKidney biopsy

Identifiers

PMID33394348
OpenAlexW3119209831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.