Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33394277›Full record

ReviewMaternal and child health journal2021

Group B Streptococcus Screening Guidelines in Pregnancy: A Critical Review of Compliance.

Sabine Pangerl, Deborah Sundin, Sadie Geraghty

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Maternal and child health journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Screening of Group BOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Antibiotic Resistance and Serotypes Distribution inPolish journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Updates on Group BMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabine PangerlKing Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
Deborah SundinEdith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Sadie GeraghtyEdith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia. s.geraghty@ecu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6920-6013
Edith Cowan University · AUKing Edward Memorial Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionColonization with Group B Streptococcus in pregnancy is a major risk factor for neonatal infection. Universal screening for maternal streptococcal colonization and the use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis has resulted in substantial reductions of neonatal early-onset Group B Streptococcus disease. To achieve the best neonatal outcomes, it is imperative for maternity healthcare providers to adhere to screening and management guidelines.

aimThis literature review uses a systematic approach and aims to provide a synthesis of what is known about compliance with Group B Streptococcus screening protocols in a variety of global settings, including maternity homes, private obstetric practice, and hospital clinical environments.

methodsThe review was carried out using electronic databases as well as hand-searching of reference lists. Included papers reported primarily on compliance with Group B Streptococcus screening guidelines, potential factors which influence compliance rates, and implementations and outcomes of interventions.

resultsSix international studies have been retained which all focused on adherence to Group B Streptococcus screening guidelines and demonstrated that different factors might have an influence on adherence to GBS screening protocols such as financial aspects and high caesarean section rates. Findings of relatively low compliance rates led to recognizing the need of developing improved strategies for optimising antenatal GBS screening adherence.

conclusionAdhering to Group B Streptococcus screening guidelines to prevent neonatal infection is crucial. Various factors influence compliance rates such as financial aspects and high proportions of caesarean sections. The implementation of strategies and different forms of education can result in improved compliance rates.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherencePractice Guidelines as TopicFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMass ScreeningPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal CarePrenatal DiagnosisStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus agalactiaeComplianceGroup B streptococcusNeonatal early-onset group b streptococcus diseasePregnancyScreening guidelines

Identifiers

PMID33394277
OpenAlexW3120570161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.