Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33394264›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2021

A contemporary update on glioblastoma: molecular biology, current management, and a vision towards bio-adaptable personalized care.

Ahmed Habib, Matthew Pease, Chowdari V Kodavali, Nduka Amankulor, Pascal O Zinn

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Novel Concepts of Glioblastoma Therapy Concerning Its Heterogeneity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmed HabibDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Matthew PeaseDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Chowdari V KodavaliDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Nduka AmankulorDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Pascal O ZinnDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. zinnpo@upmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0091-5887
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUPMC Health System · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlioblastoma (GBM) is the most fatal brain tumor in adults. Current survival rates of GBM remain below 2 years due to GBM's aggressive cellular migration and genetically driven treatment escape pathways. Despite our rapidly increasing understanding of GBM biology, earlier diagnoses, and refined surgical techniques, only moderate survival benefits have been achieved. Nonetheless, the pressing need for better survival rates has brought forward a multitude of newer therapeutic approaches and opened the door for potential personalization of these modalities in the near future.

methodsWe reviewed the published literature discussing the current state of knowledge regarding GBM biology and therapy and summarized the information that may point toward future personalized therapeutic strategies.

resultsSeveral novel modalities such as oncolytic viruses, targeted immune, and molecular therapies, and tumor treating fields have been introduced. To date, there is no single treatment modality for GBM, but rather a wide spectrum of combined modalities that address intratumoral cellular and genetic variabilities. While the current state of GBM research and clinical trial landscape may hold promise, current literature lacks any fruitful progress towards personalized GBM therapy.

conclusionIn this review, we are discussing our recent knowledge of the GBM genetic biologic landscape and the current advances in therapy, as well as providing a blueprint for an envisioned GBM management paradigm that should be personalized and adaptable to accommodate each patient's diverse genetic variations and therapy response/escape patterns.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineBrain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDisease ManagementGlioblastomaHumansImmunotherapyMolecular Targeted TherapyBiologicalGlioblastomaOrganoidPersonalized

Identifiers

PMID33394264
PMCPMC11572544
OpenAlexW3118265051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.