Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33394225›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2021

Molecular identification of Mycobacterium spp. isolated from Brazilian wild boars.

Bruna Correa Lopes, Anna Luiza Gisler Maciel, Márcia Regina Loiko, Thais Silveira Bueno, Mario Menezes Coppola, Angélica Cavalheiro Bertagnolli, Andreza Francisco Martins, Paulo Michel Roehe, David Driemeier, Fabiana Quoos Mayer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bruna Correa Lopes *Centro de Pesquisa em Saúde Animal, Instituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor, Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária, Secretaria da Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural, Eldorado do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1234-599X
Anna Luiza Gisler Maciel *Centro de Pesquisa em Saúde Animal, Instituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor, Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária, Secretaria da Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural, Eldorado do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7268-821X
Márcia Regina LoikoFeevale, Universidade Feevale, Novo Hamburgo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0514-1078
Thais Silveira BuenoCentro de Pesquisa em Saúde Animal, Instituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor, Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária, Secretaria da Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural, Eldorado do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2054-9928
Mario Menezes CoppolaCentro de Pesquisa em Saúde Animal, Instituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor, Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária, Secretaria da Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural, Eldorado do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1975-4852
Angélica Cavalheiro BertagnolliCentro de Pesquisa em Saúde Animal, Instituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor, Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária, Secretaria da Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural, Eldorado do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4956-2085
Andreza Francisco MartinsPrograma de Pós-graduação em Microbiologia Agrícola e do Ambiente, Instituto de Ciências Básicas da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6227-1920
Paulo Michel RoeheLaboratório de Virologia, Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Básicas da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2370-7661
David DriemeierPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Fabiana Quoos MayerCentro de Pesquisa em Saúde Animal, Instituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor, Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária, Secretaria da Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural, Eldorado do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. fabiana-mayer@agricultura.rs.gov.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9324-8536
Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade Feevale · BR

Funding

CMPC Celulose Riograndense C2017/067Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 303432/2015-2Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul 1967-2551/13-7Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul 833-2551/13-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild boars (Sus scrofa) are susceptible to mycobacterial infections, including tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacteria. Recently, Mycobacterium spp. infections were described in Brazilian wild boars, which can act as bacterial reservoirs. Here, we aim to characterize 15 Mycobacterium spp. isolates from Brazilian wild boars' tissues through partial sequencing of the heat shock protein 65 (hsp65) gene and phylogenetic analysis. The isolates were classified as M. tuberculosis (33.3%), M. colombiense (33.3%), M. avium subsp. hominissuis (13.3%), M. parmense (13.3%) and M. mantenii (6.66%). The isolates classified as M. tuberculosis were confirmed as variant bovis by PCR. At phylogenetic analysis some isolates formed separated clades, indicating genetic variability. Different Mycobacterium species were recovered from wild boars circulating in Brazil, including mycobacteria associated to zoonotic infections, such as M. tuberculosis. In addition, this is the first report in Brazilian wild boars on M. mantenii and M. parmense detection, two recently described pathogenic mycobacteria. However, the isolates' genetic diversity-i.e. identities lower than 100% when compared to reference sequences-suggests that other genotyping tools would allow a deeper characterization. Nonetheless, the reported data contributes to the knowledge on mycobacterial infections in wild boars from Brazil.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrazilDisease ReservoirsDNA, BacterialGenetic VariationHumansMycobacteriumMycobacterium tuberculosisPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASus scrofaSwineSwine DiseasesTuberculosisDNA, BacterialGenotypinghsp65 gene sequencingMycobacterium avium complexMycobacterium manteniiMycobacterium parmenseMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisWild boars

Identifiers

PMID33394225
OpenAlexW3119645076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.